izpis_h1_title_alt

Using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Inventory of Problems Memory (IOP-M) in malingering-related assessments : a study with a Slovenian sample of experimental feigners
ID Šömen, Maja Maša (Author), ID Lesjak, Staša (Author), ID Majaron, Teja (Author), ID Lavopa, Luca (Author), ID Giromini, Luciano (Author), ID Viglione, Donald (Author), ID Podlesek, Anja (Author)

URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12207-021-09412-2 This link opens in a new window
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12207-021-09412-2 This link opens in a new window
.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (958,59 KB)
MD5: CE5289132120FE58FC0EB6B084A93342

Abstract
A recently published article harshly criticized forensic practitioners operating in Slovenia for not including in their assessments any tests specifically designed to assess negative distortion (Areh, 2020). To promote better forensic assessment practice and stimulate future research on symptom and performance validity assessment in Slovenia, the current study translated the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29; Viglione & Giromini, 2020) and its recently developed memory module (IOP-M; Giromini et al., 2020) into Slovene language and tested their validity and effectiveness by conducting a simulation/analogue study. Among 150 volunteers, 50 completed the IOP-29 and IOP-M under standard instructions; 50 were asked to respond as if they suffered from depression; and 50 were asked to respond pretending to suffer from schizophrenia. Statistical analyses showed that (1) the IOP-29 discriminated well between simulators and honest test-takers (▫$d \ge$▫ 3.56), demonstrating the same effectiveness when inspecting feigned depression (sensitivity = 88%) and feigned schizophrenia (sensitivity = 88%) at an almost perfect specificity (98%); (2) the IOP-M identified 50% of simulators of depression and 80% of simulators of schizophrenia at perfect specificity (100%); and (3) combining the results of the IOP-29 with those of the IOP-M notably improved classification accuracy so as to demonstrate incremental validity. Taken together, these findings provide initial support for using the IOP-29 and IOP-M in applied settings in Slovenia. Limitations related to the design of the study and recommendations for further research are provided.

Language:English
Keywords:psychological assessment, malingering, symptom validity tests, performance validity tests, Inventory of problems - 29 IOP - 29, Inventory of problems memory IOP - M, symptom validity tests, inventory of problems
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication date:01.01.2021
Year:2021
Number of pages:Str. 104-113
Numbering:Vol. 14, iss. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-136904 This link opens in a new window
UDC:159.9.072
ISSN on article:1938-971X
DOI:10.1007/s12207-021-09412-2 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:65582339 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:24.05.2022
Views:712
Downloads:227
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Psychological injury and law
Shortened title:Psychol. inj. law
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:1938-971X
COBISS.SI-ID:518448409 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:14.05.2021

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:psihološko ocenjevanje, simuliranje, testi veljavnosti simptomov, testi veljavnosti dosežkov

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back