SODNO ODLOČANJE IN UMETNA INTELIGENCA

Lukman, Urh (author)

Umetna inteligenca vedno bolj kroji naša življenja. Zagon, ki ga prinaša pandemija COVID-19 in inflacija novih tehnologij, se prenašata tudi v sodne sisteme. Vprašanje, ki si ga upravičeno lahko zastavimo, je, ali bo umetna inteligenca sodniku samo v pomoč ali pa ga bo tudi nadomestila. Nekateri vidiki sodnega odločanja so v bolj razvitih državah na tem področju že nadomeščeni z umetno inteligenco. Zato si moramo posledice tega dobro pogledati in uvesti umetno inteligenco na tak način, da zmanjšamo negativne posledice, ki bodo nedvomno nastale. Iz aktivnosti Evropske unije je opazno, da se na vstop tehnologij umetne inteligence dobro pripravljamo, vendar konkretnejša pravila še ne obstajajo. V bližnji prihodnosti bodo algoritmi umetne inteligence gotovo pomagali sodnikom pri njihovem odločanju, vendar nadomestili človeškega sodnika najbrž še ne bodo. Obstaja veliko etičnih in praktičnih vidikov, ki to zaenkrat še preprečujejo. V daljno prihodnost seveda ne moremo videti, še težje lahko predvidimo razvoj novih tehnologij, zato bo popolna nadomestitev človeškega sodnika, tema, ki se ji tudi v prihodnosti ne bomo mogli izogniti. Važno je, da zastavimo zakonodajo že danes, da negativne lastnosti umetne inteligence izničimo ali vsaj bistveno zmanjšamo, saj gre za sodni sistem, ki mora biti učinkovit in pravičen, saj si brez tega ne moremo predstavljati moderne in bistveno bolj pomembno, družbe prihodnosti.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: umetna inteligenca, sodno odločanje, etika, strojno učenje, sodnik, algoritem
• Work type: Master's thesis/paper
• Organization: PF - Faculty of Law
• Year: 2022
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-136208
• COBISS.SI-ID: 109913347
• Publication date in RUL: 20.04.2022

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly shaping our lives. The momentum of new technologies brought upon by the COVID-19 pandemic and the inflation are transferring over to judicial systems. The main question we should be asking ourselves at this point is, whether artificial intelligence will only help our judges or also replace them. Some aspects of judicial decision-making have already been replaced by artificial intelligence in some developed countries. We must therefore take a good look at the consequences of this phenomenon and introduce artificial intelligence in such a way as to minimize the negative consequences that will undoubtedly arise. It is evident from the European Union's activities that we are preparing for the entry of artificial intelligence technologies, but there are no concrete rules as of yet. Soon, artificial intelligence algorithms will surely help judges in their decision-making, but they will not yet replace them. There are many ethical and practical considerations preventing this from happening as of now. We have yet to see future endeavours in the field of artificial intelligence unfold, so the complete replacement of the human judge will be a topic that we will not be able to avoid in the future. It is important that we recognize, legislate and reduce negative features of artificial intelligence today so the judicial system remains efficient and fair for generations to come. Without it, there is no modern society.

• Keywords: Artificial intelligence, judicial decision-making, ethics, machine learning, judge, algorithm