izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava čelnega in zalednega testiranja v okolju neprekinjenega testiranja
ID STERLE, ANDRAŽ (Author), ID Rožanc, Igor (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (573,23 KB)
MD5: EDD64B9D8AA77538A9420D6A83F13292

Abstract
V diplomski nalogi smo se osredotočili na primerjavo testiranja na čelnem in zalednem delu sistema. Pregledali in izbrali smo potrebna orodja in tehnologije, s katerimi smo ustvarili testno aplikacijo in ustrezni DevOps cevovod. Pri tem smo se posebej posvetili razlikam in sposobnostim testnih ogrodij na čelnem in zalednem delu sistema. Izbrali smo tista, ki so bila najbolje ocenjena glede na naše kriterije in naše poznavanje teh ogrodij. Nato smo preko cevovoda na testni aplikaciji pognali testne primere in opisali postopek ter delovanje cevovoda. Ob primerjavi rezultatov smo ugotovili, da nam pri testni aplikaciji za polno primerjavo testnih ogrodij in postopkov na čelnem in zalednem delu, primanjkuje primerna zahtevnost in obseg aplikacije. Kljub temu smo prišli do zaključka, da je DevOps cevovod z neprekinjenim testiranjem neprecenljiv za podjetja vseh velikosti, ki razvijajo programsko opremo.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:DevOps, neprekinjeno testiranje, neprekinjena integracija, testi enot, integracijski testi, Jenkins, Docker
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FRI - Faculty of Computer and Information Science
Year:2022
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-135053 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:98328067 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:18.02.2022
Views:901
Downloads:113
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison of frontend and backend testing in a continuous testing environment
Abstract:
In this thesis we focused on the comparison of frontend and backend testing. We reviewed and selected the necessary tools and technologies required to create a test application and the appropriate DevOps pipeline. We paid special attention to the differences and capabilities of both frontend and backend test frameworks. We selected the best rated according to our criteria and our knowledge of these frameworks. We then ran the test cases via our pipeline on the test application and described the process and operation of the pipeline. While comparing the results, we found that our test application lacks sufficient complexity and scope for a full comparison of frontend and backend test frameworks and procedures. Nevertheless, we have come to the conclusion that a DevOps pipeline with continuous testing is invaluable for all size companies developing software.

Keywords:Devops, continuous testing, continuous integration, unit testing, integration testing, Jenkins, Docker

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back