Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Inventory of Problems Memory (IOP-M) in malingering-related assessments : a study with a Slovenian sample of experimental feigners
ID
Šömen, Maja Maša
(
Author
),
ID
Lesjak, Staša
(
Author
),
ID
Majaron, Teja
(
Author
),
ID
Lavopa, Luca
(
Author
),
ID
Giromini, Luciano
(
Author
),
ID
Viglione, Donald
(
Author
),
ID
Podlesek, Anja
(
Author
)
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12207-021-09412-2
Image galllery
Abstract
A recently published article harshly criticized forensic practitioners operating in Slovenia for not including in their assessments any tests specifically designed to assess negative distortion (Areh, 2020). To promote better forensic assessment practice and stimulate future research on symptom and performance validity assessment in Slovenia, the current study translated the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29; Viglione & Giromini, 2020) and its recently developed memory module (IOP-M; Giromini et al., 2020) into Slovene language and tested their validity and effectiveness by conducting a simulation/analogue study. Among 150 volunteers, 50 completed the IOP-29 and IOP-M under standard instructions; 50 were asked to respond as if they suffered from depression; and 50 were asked to respond pretending to suffer from schizophrenia. Statistical analyses showed that (1) the IOP-29 discriminated well between simulators and honest test-takers (d 3.56), demonstrating the same effectiveness when inspecting feigned depression (sensitivity = 88%) and feigned schizophrenia (sensitivity = 88%) at an almost perfect specificity (98%); (2) the IOP-M identified 50% of simulators of depression and 80% of simulators of schizophrenia at perfect specificity (100%); and (3) combining the results of the IOP-29 with those of the IOP-M notably improved classification accuracy so as to demonstrate incremental validity. Taken together, these findings provide initial support for using the IOP-29 and IOP-M in applied settings in Slovenia. Limitations related to the design of the study and recommendations for further research are provided.
Language:
English
Keywords:
psychological assessment
,
malingering
,
symptom validity tests
,
performance validity tests
,
Inventory of problems - 29 IOP - 29
,
Inventory of problems memory IOP - M
,
offprints
Work type:
Offprint
Organization:
FF - Faculty of Arts
Place of publishing:
New York
Publisher:
Springer
Year:
2021
Number of pages:
10 str.
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-134829
UDC:
159.9.072(0.036.6)
COBISS.SI-ID:
96228355
Publication date in RUL:
03.02.2022
Views:
853
Downloads:
183
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
psihološko ocenjevanje
,
simuliranje
,
testi veljavnosti simptomov
,
testi veljavnosti dosežkov
,
separati
Projects
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
P5-0110
Name:
Psihološki in nevroznanstveni vidiki kognicije
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back