izpis_h1_title_alt

Health professionals' knowledge of probiotics : an international survey
ID Fijan, Sabina (Author), ID Frauwallner, Anita (Author), ID Varga, László (Author), ID Langerholc, Tomaž (Author), ID Rogelj, Irena (Author), ID Lorber, Mateja (Author), ID Lewis, Peter (Author), ID Povalej Bržan, Petra (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,55 MB)
MD5: 92999CE1EE80B1956F089C325B515091
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/17/3128 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
The objective of this study was to survey health professionals to investigate their knowledge of probiotics. An online survey was conducted to gather data on the knowledge of health professionals. The online survey was distributed via email and social media platforms using snowball sampling. A total of 1066 health professionals (859; 80.6% female) from 30 countries responded to the survey. Most of the respondents evaluated their knowledge of probiotics as medium (36.4%) or good (36.2%). Only 8.9% of the respondents rated it as excellent. No statistical difference in knowledge was found between male and female health professionals. Over 80% of pharmacists, allied health professionals, medical doctors and dentists, and other health professionals knew the correct definition of probiotics as “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host”, whereas three quarters of registered nurses and midwives and less than two thirds of psychologists identified the correct definition. Statistically, more female than male health professionals knew the correct definition of probiotics. The most frequently recognized species of bacteria containing probiotic strains were Lactobacillus acidophilus (92%), Bifidobacterium bifidum (82%), and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (62%). The opinions on when it is best to take probiotics were different (χ$^2$ = 28.375; p < 0.001), with 90.2% of respondents identifying that probiotics have beneficial effects if taken during antibiotic therapy, 83.5% for diarrhea, 70.6% for constipation, 63.3% before traveling abroad, and 60.4% for treating allergies. Almost 79% of health professionals involved in this study have advised their patients to use probiotics and 57.5% of the respondents wanted to learn more about probiotics. All things considered, health professionals have a medium level of knowledge of probiotics, which could be improved by the implementation of targeted learning programs. As probiotics have many beneficial effects in a wide range of health areas, health professionals need to adopt the use of probiotics in clinical practice.

Language:English
Keywords:probiotics, knowledge, health professionals
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2019
Number of pages:16 str.
Numbering:Vol. 16, iss. 17, art. 3128
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-132793 This link opens in a new window
UDC:613.292
ISSN on article:1660-4601
DOI:10.3390/ijerph16173128 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:2516644 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:03.11.2021
Views:788
Downloads:194
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:International journal of environmental research and public health
Shortened title:Int. j. environ. res. public health
Publisher:MDPI
ISSN:1660-4601
COBISS.SI-ID:1818965 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:01.09.2019

Projects

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:University of Maribor, Faculty of Health Sciences
Name:Methods for Studying Probiotics

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:Government of Hungary
Project number:EFOP-3.6.1-16-2016-00017

Funder:EC - European Commission
Funding programme:European Social Fund

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back