izpis_h1_title_alt

Odškodninska odgovornost v zdravstvu - novejši trendi razvoja sodne prakse
ID Zupančič, Hana (Author), ID Žnidaršič Skubic, Viktorija (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (941,51 KB)
MD5: 76E846C44466601CAE058766A8487577

Abstract
Odškodninska odgovornost v zdravstvu je zakonsko predvidena za primere medicinskih (strokovnih) napak. Kdaj ravnanje zdravnika ali zdravstvenih (so)delavcev ni ustrezalo standardu dobrega strokovnjaka, pove izvedenec, ki s svojim strokovnim znanjem in izkušnjami, opiše vsebino standarda potrebnega ravnanja. V kolikor je bilo ravnanje v skladu s sprejeto medicinsko doktrino, zdravniku oziroma zdravstvenim (so)delavcem ni mogoče očitati glede pacientovega zdravstvenega stanja, ker je to posledica poteka same bolezni. Novejša sodna praksa razmerje med zdravnikom in pacientom presoja na podlagi podjemne pogodbe, le izjemoma pride do vzpostavitve odgovornosti na podlagi delikta. Predpostavke, ki morajo biti kumulativno izpolnjene za vzpostavitev odškodninske odgovornosti na eni ali drugi podlagi, so iste. Protipravnost, vzročno zvezo in škodo dokazuje oškodovanec, zaradi domneve krivde, ekskulpacijske razloge dokazuje zdravnik ali zdravstvena ustanova, v kateri je povzročitelj škode zaposlen. Sodna praksa je zaradi neenakopravnega položaja, ki ga imata po eni strani zdravnik oziroma zdravstvena ustanova, po drugi pa in pacient, slednjim začela olajševati položaj tako, da morajo pri dokazovanju zadostiti dokaznemu standardu mejnega pragu pretežne verjetnosti. V skladu s tem gre za sklepanje, da je zatrjevano dejstvo najverjetnejši vzrok zatrjevanega škodnega dogodka. Tesno povezavo tvorita pojasnilna dolžnost in privolitev pacienta. Samo če bo pojasnilna dolžnost pravilno izpolnjena, bo privolitev pacienta veljavna. S pacientovo privolitvijo pa bo protipravnost posega v telesno in duševno celovitost, varovano s 35. členom Ustave Republike Slovenije, odvzeta.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:strokovna napaka, zdravniška napaka, pogodbena odškodninska odgovornost, nepogodbena (deliktna) odškodninska odgovornost, odgovornost za drugega, standard dobrega strokovnjaka, pojasnilna dolžnost, privolitev oškodovanca, dokazno breme, izvedenec
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2021
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-131538 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:78816771 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:29.09.2021
Views:2453
Downloads:309
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Compensation liability in healthcare - recent trends in the development of case law
Abstract:
Compensation liability in healthcare is legally provided for cases of medical (professional) errors. When the conduct of a doctor or health (co)worker did not meet the standards of due skill, an expert with comparable skills, using his expertise, shall describe the content of the standard required. If the practice followed the accepted medical doctrine, the doctor or medical (co)worker can not be critised for the patient's state of health as it is due to the course of a disease itself. More recent case-law assesses the doctor-patient relationship on the basis of an agreement, only exceptionally, however, the liability is established on the basis of a delict. The assumptions that must be cumulatively fulfilled in order to establish liability for damages on one or another basis are the same. The injury must be proved by the injured party on the grounds of guilt, the exculpatory reasons must be proved by the doctor or the medical establishment in which the person concerned is employed. Due to the unequal position of the doctor or the medical establishment vis-a-vis the patient, the case-law has made the situation easier for the latter in such a way that in order to demonstrate, they must satisfy the standard of proof of the threshold of a particular probability. Accordingly, it can be concluded that the alleged fact is the most likely the cause of the alleged in-law event. Close connection consists of explanatory duty and consent of the patient. Only if the explanatory duty is properly fulfilled, the patient's consent is valid and it deprives the usual unjustified infringement with the physical and mental integrity protected by Article 35 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia.

Keywords:professional error, medical error, contractual liability, tortious liability, responsibility for the other, standard of a good professional, the duty to explain (explanatory duty), consent of the injured party, the burden of proof, medical expert

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back