izpis_h1_title_alt

Napetosti v cementiranem in kaljenem zobniku z ravnimi zobmi
ID Gaberšček, Gregor (Author), ID Nagode, Marko (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Šeruga, Domen (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (3,51 MB)
MD5: D22E48026DDD3E1A54A7815306B9C46C

Abstract
Cementacija in kaljenje omogočata, da ima zobnik žilavo jedro in trdo površino, zato imajo termično obdelani zobniki boljšo trdnost in obrabno odpornost v primerjavi s termično neobdelanimi. Postopek utrjevanja površine izboljša odpornost zobnika na sunkovite mehanske obremenitve in na obrabo. V tem delu smo se posvetili izključno obravnavi trdnosti zobnika. Primerjali smo, kakšen zobnik bolje prenaša statično mehansko obremenitev ter vzroke za to. Postopek termične obdelave smo simulirali v programu ANSYS z metalurškim paketom DANTE, s čimer smo predvideli porazdelitev zaostalih napetosti. To je bilo začetno stanje ob dodajanju mehanske obremenitve na zob zobnika. Za primerjavo smo simulirali enak zob, ki je bil deležen zgolj mehanske obremenitve. Tak primer smo tudi analitično preračunali. Pri iskanju vzrokov za nastalo stanje smo ugotovili, da se pri nastajanju martenzita povečajo tlačne napetosti. Te skupaj s krčenjem zaradi ohlajanja ustvarijo površinsko plast s tlačnimi napetostmi. Videli smo, da v vsakem primeru ta plast vpliva na boljše prenašanje mehanske obremenitve. Na koncu so analitični rezultati odstopali od numeričnih v vrednostih do 150 MPa. Ob upravičenih razlogih, kot so izbira robnih pogojev, mesta rezultatov in koeficienti v enačbah smo sklepali, da so pravilni. Potrdili in pojasnili smo, zakaj so termično obdelani zobniki boljši kot termično neobdelani.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:zobniki, numerične analize, analitika, ogljičenje, kaljenje, zaostale napetosti
Work type:Final paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[G. Gaberšček]
Year:2021
Number of pages:XII, 31 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-129901 This link opens in a new window
UDC:621.833:621.785.5:519.6(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:82835203 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:09.09.2021
Views:1557
Downloads:73
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Stresses in cemented and quenched spur gear
Abstract:
Cementation and hardening allow the gear to have a tough core and a hard surface, so heat-treated gears have better strength and wear resistance compared to non heat-treated ones. The surface hardening process improves the resistance of the gear to shock mechanical loads and wear. In this paper, we have focused exclusively on dealing with gear strength. We compared which gear better withstands static mechanic load and the reasons for this. The heat treatment process was simulated in the ANSYS program with the DANTE metallurgical package, in order to be able to predict the distribution of residual stresses. This was the initial condition when adding mechanical load to the gear tooth. For comparison, we simulated the same tooth that received only a mechanical load. Such an example was also analytically recalculated. When searching for the causes of this condition, we found that the formation of martensite increases the compressive stresses and these, together with the shrinkage due to cooling, create a surface layer with compressive stresses. We have seen that in any case, this layer has an effect on better load tolerance. In the end, the analytical results deviated from numerical ones up to 150 MPa. Given the justified reasons, such as the chosen boundary conditions, the places of the results and the coefficients in the equations, we concluded that they were correct. We confirmed and explained why heat-treated gears are better than non heat-treated ones

Keywords:spur gears, numerical analysis, analytics, carburising, quenching, residual stresses

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back