izpis_h1_title_alt

Dejavniki spremembe pri delu v skupini : diplomsko delo
ID Barbo, Anja (Author), ID Zorn, Jelka (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (4,15 MB)
MD5: 3900091F3B5C7A4D1AD5EAC33F000F24

Abstract
Tema mojega diplomskega dela so dejavniki, ki vplivajo na to, ali bo vključenost v skupinsko obliko psihosocialne pomoči uspešna. V teoretičnem delu sem predstavila temeljne metode socialnega dela in vrste skupin. Prav tako sem navedla in opisala skupne faktorje (dejavniki spremembe, ki so skupni različnim metodam dela in vej psihosocialne pomoči) in jih prenesla v kontekst socialnega dela. Opisala sem tudi specifične faktorje (dejavniki, ki so specifični za skupinsko delo). Teoretični del sem zaključila s povzetkom dosedanjih raziskav o uspešnosti doseganja ciljev v skupini. V empiričnem delu sem predstavila rezultate kvalitativne raziskave, ki sem jo izvedla na neslučajnostnem vzorcu desetih sogovornikov. V pogovoru z njimi me je zanimala njihova izkušnja z vključenostjo v skupino, kaj je njihove želene spremembe spodbujalo in kaj zaviralo, katere prednosti in slabosti vključenosti prepoznavajo ter kako ocenjujejo uspešnost doseganja ciljev v skupini. Raziskava je v veliki meri potrdila raziskave, iz katerih sem izhajala v teoriji. Raziskava je potrdila, da obstajajo dejavniki, ki so skupni tako delu v skupini kot drugim metodam socialnega dela. Raziskava je potrdila tudi, da skupni dejavniki (pomagajoči, uporabnik, delovni odnos, socialna mreža in strategije prakse) pomembno vplivajo na doseganje želenih sprememb. Raziskava je pokazala, kako pomembno je, da je skupina dostopna za člane (geografsko, finančno). Prav tako je raziskava potrdila, da na doseganje želenih sprememb vplivajo tudi dejavniki, specifični za delo v skupini (vlivanje upanja, univerzalnost, posredovanje/podeljevanje informacij, altruizem, razvoj socialnih spretnosti, skupinska povezanost, katarza in medosebno učenje v medosebnih odnosih). Pomembno je, da so socialni delavci in delavke pri ocenjevanju uspešnosti podpore pozorne_i tako na skupne kot na specifične dejavnike. Pomembno je tudi, da pomagajoči v času, ko prejema podporo in pomoč, razišče vse dejavnike (skupne in specifične) članov skupine, ki spodbujajo ali pa zavirajo želene spremembe. Vključenost v skupino ima tako prednosti (npr. povratne informacije od različnih ljudi, vzajemna pomoč med člani, normalizacija) kot slabosti (tihi člani, nezaželena vedenja članov, kršitev zaupnosti). Zato je pomembno, da pri negativnih dejavnikih vodja posreduje tam, kjer ima vpliv, npr. spodbuja tihe člane k sodelovanju in asertivnejše člane k poslušanju ostalih članov. Pomembno je tudi, da skupina ni prevelika. Večina sogovornikov poroča o uspešnem doseganju ciljev v skupini. Je pa raziskava pokazala, da članom skupine pomaga, če imajo ob vključenosti v skupino tudi možnost individualne oblike podpore in pomoči.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:skupni dejavniki, specifični dejavniki spremembe, učinkovitost, prednosti skupinskega dela, slabosti skupinskega dela
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FSD - Faculty of Social Work
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[A. Barbo]
Year:2021
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (221 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-128992 This link opens in a new window
UDC:316.454.7:364-785.24
COBISS.SI-ID:81476355 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:21.08.2021
Views:901
Downloads:162
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The Factors of Change in Group Work
Abstract:
The topic of my graduation thesis are factors that influence whether being included in a group psychosocial support will be successful or not. In the theoretical part, I discuss the basic methods of social work and types of groups. I also list and describe common factors (factors of change that are common for different methods and branches of psychosocial support) and bring them into the context of social work. I also describe specific factors (factors that are specific for group work). I conclude the theoretical part by summing up the findings up till now about the efficacy of achieving goals in a group. In the empirical part, I present the results of the qualitative research that I implemented on a non-probability accidental sample of 10 interviewees. When talking to them, I was interested in their experience of being included in a group and the factors that encouraged and discouraged their desired changes, the advantages and disadvantages of group work that they can recognize, and how they would rate the efficacy of achieving desired goals in the group. The research confirms surveys on which I based my theoretical part to a great extent. The survey proves that there are factors that are common for group work and other methods of social work. The survey also proves that common factors (helper, user, working relationship, social network and practice strategies) have a significant impact on achieving desired changes. The survey shows the importance of the availability (geographical, financial) of the group for its members. The research also confirms that specific factors in group work, such as installation of hope, universality, imparting information, altruism, development of socializing techniques, group cohesion, catharsis and interpersonal learning in interpersonal relationships, also influence achieving desired changes. It is important that social workers pay attention to both common and specific factors when they are accessing the efficacy of psychosocial support. It is also important that social workers explore all factors (common and specific) of group members that are encouraging or discouraging desired changes. Participation in a group has both advantages (feedback from different people, mutual help among group members, normalization) and disadvantages (quiet members, unwanted behavior from members, breaking confidentiality). Therefore, it is important that, when negative factors appear, the leader intervenes in every way they can e.g., encouraging quiet members to participate and encouraging assertive members to listen to other members. It is also important that the group is not too big. Most co-speakers report successfully achieving their goals in the group. The research also showed that group members benefit more if aside from participation in a group, they also have the possibility of an individual form of support and help.

Keywords:common factors, specific factors of change, efficacy, advantages of group work, disadvantages of group work

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back