izpis_h1_title_alt

Nasprotovanje cepljenju v Sloveniji : magistrsko delo
ID Hađić, Alema (Author), ID Kovačič, Gorazd (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Cergol Paradiž, Ana (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Keber, Katarina (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (3,14 MB)
MD5: D4D9DB2AF74BE851248BCD2EE26A89FB

Abstract
Magistrsko delo se ukvarja s pojavom nasprotovanja cepljenju v Sloveniji. Najprej predstavi zgodovinski pregled uvedbe obveznega cepljenja v slovenskem prostoru in vpliv, ki ga je cepljenje imelo na zmanjšano obolevanost zaradi teh bolezni. Zatem opiše organizacijo cepljenja v današnjem času v Sloveniji in drugod ter predstavi zgodovinski oris proticepilskega gibanja. V nadaljevanju se ukvarja z vprašanjem, kdaj se je v Sloveniji okrepilo proticepilstvo. S pomočjo več raziskovalnih metod ugotovi, da se je proticepilsko gibanje javno okrepilo okoli leta 2000. Nato delo obravnava vprašanje, katere družbene okoliščine so vplivale na okrepitev proticepilstva v Sloveniji. Ugotavlja, da se proticepilske ideje širijo na spletu, predvsem na družbenem omrežju Facebook. Raziskuje povezave med razmahom idej in praks novodobništva in proticepilstvom, pri čemer na podlagi intervjujev z nasprotniki cepljenja ugotovi, da je med njimi veliko privržencev alternativne medicine. V zadnjem delu se naloga ukvarja z vprašanjem, ali je v Sloveniji proticepilstvo bolj prisotno med višje izobraženimi, bolj premožnimi in urbanimi prebivalci. Na podlagi intervjujev s pediatri in nasprotniki cepljenja ugotovi, da se proticepilstvo širi predvsem v tem segmentu družbe. Analiza primarnih podatkov študije NIJZ in UL FDV pokaže, da kar 30 % mam, ki se uvrščajo v višji razred, svojih otrok ne bi cepilo, če bi se mu lahko izognile. Matere, ki so cepljenje v celoti odklanjale so se uvrstile v srednji ali višji srednji razred. V nadaljevanju delo odgovarja na vprašanje, zakaj se proticepilstvo širi ravno v tem segmentu družbe, pri čemer analizira primarne podatke študije Slovensko javno mnenje 2016/1. Ugotavlja, da del premožnih proticepilcev nasprotuje cepljenju tudi zaradi tega, ker izražajo stališča neoliberalnega interesnega individualizma, zaradi česar zanemarjajo interese skupnosti in se osredotočajo zgolj na svoje otroke. Del premožnih staršev pa cepljenju nasprotuje zaradi naklonjenosti alternativni medicini.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:proticepilstvo, splet, novodobništvo, komplementarna in alternativna medicina, neoliberalizem, interesni individualizem
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Year:2020
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-127341 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:57204739 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:03.06.2021
Views:2463
Downloads:331
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Opposition to vaccination in Slovenia
Abstract:
This master's thesis studies the phenomenon of opposition to vaccination in Slovenia. In the beginning, it presents a historical overview of the introduction of compulsory vaccination in Slovenia and the impact that vaccination had on reduced morbidity due to these diseases. Then it continues with the description of current organization of vaccination in Slovenia and elsewhere, and it presents a historical outline of the anti-vaccination movement. The thesis also deals with the question of when anti-vaccination intensified in Slovenia. The results, obtained using several research methods, show that the anti-vaccination movement intensified around the year 2000. The paper then discusses which social circumstances influenced the strengthening of anti-vaccination movement in Slovenia. It finds out that anti-vaccination ideas are spreading online, especially through the social network Facebook. The thesis also explores the links between the rise of new age ideas, practices and anti-vaccination, finding that opposition to vaccination is more prevalent among adherents of alternative medicine. In the last part, the thesis deals with the question of whether anti-vaccination in Slovenia is more present among well-educated and wealthier people and those living in urban areas. The findings, based on the interviews with pediatricians and opponents of vaccination, show that anti-vaccination movement is spreading mainly in this segment of society. An analysis of the primary data from the studies conducted by the National Institute of Public Health and the Faculty of Social Sciences (University of Ljubljana) shows that 30 % of upper-class mothers would not vaccinate their children if they could avoid it. Mothers who refused vaccination altogether identified themselves as belonging to the middle- or uppermiddle class. The thesis then answers the question why anti-vaccination is spreading in this segment of society, analysing the primary data of the study Slovenian Public Opinion 2016/1. It notes that some wealthy people oppose vaccination because they express views of neoliberal interest individualism, which means that they neglect the interests of community and focus solely on their own child. Some of the affluent parents also oppose vaccination due to the adoption of alternative medicine.

Keywords:anti-vaccination, Internet, new age, complementary and alternative medicine, neoliberalism, interest individualism

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back