Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Nature-based solutions in the urban context - terminology, classification and scoring for urban challenges and ecosystem services
ID
Castellar, Joana A. C
(
Author
),
ID
Atanasova, Nataša
(
Author
),
ID
Langergraber, Günter
(
Author
),
ID
Acuňa, Vicenç
(
Author
)
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146237
Image galllery
Abstract
The concept of Nature-BasedSolutions (NBS)has emerged tofostersustainable development bytransversallyad-dressing social, economic, and environmental urban challenges. However, there is still a considerable lack ofagreement on the conceptualization of NBS, especially concerning typologies, nomenclature, and performanceassessments in terms of ecosystem services (ES) and urban challenges (UC). Therefore, this article consolidatesthe knowledge from 4 European projects to set a path for a common understanding of NBS and thus, facilitatetheir mainstreaming. To do so,firstly, we performed elicitation workshops to develop an integrative list ofNBS, based on the identification of overlaps among NBS from different projects. The terminologies were formal-ized via web-based surveys. Secondly, the NBS were clustered, following a conceptual hierarchical classification.Thirdly, we developed an integrative assessment of NBS performance (ES and UC) based on the qualitative eval-uations from each project. Afterwards, we run a PCA and calculated the evenness index to explore patternsamong NBS. The main conceptual advancement resides in providing a list of 32 NBS and putting forward twonovel NBS categories: NBS units (NBSu) that are stand-alone green technologies or green urban spaces, whichcan be combined with other solutions (nature-based or not); NBS interventions (NBSi) that refer to the act of in-tervening in existing ecosystems and in NBSu, by applying techniques to support natural processes. The statisticalanalysis suggests that NBSuare more versatile than NBSiin terms of UC and ES
Language:
English
Work type:
Scientific work
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Submitted for review:
12.11.2020
Article acceptance date:
26.02.2021
Publication date:
05.03.2021
Year:
2021
Number of pages:
Str. 1-13
Numbering:
Letn. 779/146237
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-127269
UDC:
502/504:72
ISSN on article:
0048-9697
DOI:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146237
COBISS.SI-ID:
57949187
Publication date in RUL:
01.06.2021
Views:
777
Downloads:
82
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Science of the total environment
Shortened title:
Sci. total environ.
Publisher:
Elsevier
ISSN:
0048-9697
COBISS.SI-ID:
26369024
Projects
Funder:
EC - European Commission
Project number:
776665
Name:
Integrating Edible City Solutions for social resilient and sustainably productive cities
Acronym:
EdiCitNet
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back