izpis_h1_title_alt

Numerical and experimental investigation of the energy and exergy performance of solar thermal, photovoltaic and photovoltaic-thermal modules based on roll-bond heat exchangers
ID Poredoš, Primož (Author), ID Tomc, Urban (Author), ID Petelin, Nada (Author), ID Vidrih, Boris (Author), ID Flisar, Uroš (Author), ID Kitanovski, Andrej (Author)

.docxDOCX - Presentation file, Download (8,50 MB)
MD5: F24311B7B7CB8FF669B825B3D8759B9F
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890420302120?via%3Dihub This link opens in a new window

Abstract
This paper presents numerical and experimental energy and exergy performance assessments of solar thermal (ST), photovoltaic (PV) and photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) modules based on roll-bond heat exchangers having three different channel geometries: serial, parallel and bionic. The validation of a coupled numerical simulation encompassing the thermo-hydraulic and electrical properties shows that 78% of all the data lies within a+/-10% uncertainty. The thermo-hydraulic simulation shows that the lowest outlet-water temperature inside the absorber is for the case of the bionic absorber (average 44.1%°C vs. 46.5%°C for the serial). This geometry is also beneficial when considering pressure losses, since compared to the parallel configuration (average 778%Pa) the bionic has significantly lower pressure losses (average 385%Pa). The simulation of the electrical properties of PV/T with all three absorber types showed the highest average solar-to-electrical efficiency (14.5%) in the case of the bionic absorber compared to the PV/T with parallel and serial absorbers (14.4% and 14.3%, respectively). Finally, a set of experiments using the ST, PV and PV/T2 (the index 2 denotes a PV/T collector variant with a foil thickness of 0.3%mm, compared to the thickness of 0.4%mm for PV/T1, positioned between the absorber and the PV cells) modules showed that the PV module, coupled with a bionic absorber plate, achieves the highest average electrical (PV - 8.5% vs. PV/T2 - 9.9%) and exergy (ST - 4.4% vs. PV - 9.2% vs. PV/T2 - 12.7%) efficiencies. Only in terms of the thermal efficiency, the PV/T is at a disadvantage to the ST (PV/T2 - 33.5% vs. ST - 61.4%) due to the air gap between the front glass and the absorber of the latter module.

Language:English
Keywords:PV/T, photovoltaic, solar thermal collectors, absorbers, heat exchangers, exergy
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Preprint, working version of publication, not peer-reviewed
Year:2020
Number of pages:Str. 1-21
Numbering:Vol. 210
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-124498 This link opens in a new window
UDC:621.383.51(045)
ISSN on article:0196-8904
DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112674 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:17080603 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:27.01.2021
Views:798
Downloads:240
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Energy conversion and management
Shortened title:Energy convers. manage.
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0196-8904
COBISS.SI-ID:2618919 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:PV/T, fotonapetost, sprejemniki sončne energije, absorberji, prenosniki toplote, eksergija

Projects

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P2-0223
Name:Prenos toplote in snovi

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:Zavod za trajnostno in inovativno gradbeništvo
Project number:3211-10-000465
Name:TIGR
Acronym:ZTIGR Godovič

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back