Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in administrative field of law in European Union has developed due to doctrine of good governance and Europeanization of administrative procedural law. Being compared to civil law, administrative law primarily protects public benefit, which consequentially leads to restrictions regarding the use of alternative dispute resolution in the administrative field. Implementing alternative dispute resolution in the administrative field leads to benefits, which are mainly connected with rationalization of administrative procedures, as it reduces court backlogs and lessens the burden of administrative and judicial decision-making. ADR should not be a substitute for the judicial system, it should rather complement the system, giving subjects the opportunity to contribute in the procedure and the final decision. Current regulations already include ADR through institutes, which represent alternatives to administrative or judicial proceedings. The introduction and use of ADR mechanisms in the administrative field must be well thought out and must take into account the function and goals that ADR strives to follow. This master's thesis presents relevant ADR methods in administrative matters in Slovenia and possible legislative solutions that would implement ADR methods in the Slovenian legal order. In addition to the adoption of appropriate legislation, it is important to ensure that administrative bodies are properly informed and to encourage their proactive use.
|
