izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava programske opreme s stališča avtomatske postavitve podpornih struktur pri 3D tiskanju po metodi ciljnega nalaganja
ID Oštir, Nel (Author), ID Valentinčič, Joško (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Lebar, Andrej (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,94 MB)
MD5: 88A67CB4E4B0118BF84B7D5C50E4219C

Abstract
V nalogi smo primerjali programsko opremo različnih ponudnikov s stališča podpornih struktur pri 3D tiskanju po metodi ciljnega nalaganja (anlg. fused deposition modeling). Programsko opremo smo primerjali glede na čas tiskanja in količino porabljenega materiala za tisk podpornih struktur pri različnih vrednostih parametrov podpornih struktur. Ugotovili smo, kateri tip podpornih struktur in kateri način postavitve porabi več časa in materiala za tisk. Primerjali smo, kako se poraba materiala in čas tiskanja spremenita pri spremembi parametrov podpornih struktur. Glede na izbrane kriterije Ultimaker Cura gradi najbolj optimalne drevesne podporne strukture in PrusaSlicer gradi najbolj optimalne drevesne podporne strukture.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:aditivne tehnologije, 3D tiskanje, metoda ciljnega nalaganja, tehnologija FDM, podporne strukture, programska oprema, drevesne podporne strukture, linearne podporne strukture
Work type:Final paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[N. Oštir]
Year:2020
Number of pages:XIV, 30 f.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-120034 This link opens in a new window
UDC:004.925.84:621.79:004.4(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:31540227 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:15.09.2020
Views:1429
Downloads:191
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Evaluation of the software for automatic generation of support structures in 3D printing by fused filament fabrication method
Abstract:
Different providers’ software was analysed in terms of support structures by fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Two features of software for printing support structures were compared, namely printing time and consumed material by setting different parameters of support structures. The goal was to find out which type and way of placement of support structures is the most effective in terms of printing time and material consumption. By changing different parameters, the printing times and material consumption were compared. Based on selected criteria PrusaSlicer generates the most optimal linear support structures and Ultimaker Cura generates the most optimal tree-like support structures.

Keywords:additive technologies, 3D printing, fused deposition modelling, FDM technology, support structures, software, linear support structures, tree-like support structures

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back