izpis_h1_title_alt

Analiza in primerjava 3D zajema s strukturirano svetlobo in fotogrametrijo
ID Ahčin, Nuša (Author), ID Muck, Deja (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,98 MB)
MD5: 67E0A48A3EB4E4CA1AD2073FAB45AB13

Abstract
V diplomskem delu so predstavljeni različni načini 3D zajema objektov. Opisane so različne tehnologije, ki se uporabljajo, s poudarkom na fotogrametriji in 3D skeniranju s strukturirano svetlobo. Glavni namen diplomskega dela je bil predstaviti tehnologije 3D zajema, njihove prednosti in slabosti, hkrati pa tudi preizkusiti dva načina 3D zajema (fotogrametrijski in s strukturirano svetlobo) ter primerjati in analizirati rezultate zajemov. Ugotoviti, kako se načina razlikujeta v sami kakovosti na končnem predmetu, kateri postopek je hitrejši, cenovno dostopnejši, uporabnejši pod različnimi pogoji. Želeli smo odgovoriti na vprašanje ali lahko s cenovno bolj dostopno tehnologijo zajema, to je s fotogrametrijo dobimo primerljive rezultate 3D skeniranju s strukturirano svetlobo. Najprej so bili izbrani predmeti za skeniranje različne velikosti, teksture, barve in oblike. Sledili so različni preizkusi 3D zajema in na koncu primerjava najbolje uspelih končnih 3D modelov.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:3D zajem, 3D skeniranje, strukturirana svetloba, fotogrametrija, 3D model
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:NTF - Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering
Year:2020
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-116505 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:26.05.2020
Views:1569
Downloads:430
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Analysis and comparison of 3D capturing with structured light and photogrammetry
Abstract:
The diploma thesis discusses different technologies of 3D scanning. The thesis describes some technologies with emphasis on photogrammetry and 3D structured light scanning. The goal of the diploma thesis was to describe 3D scanning technologies, their advantages and limitation or disadvantages. The main goal was to test photogrammetry and 3D scanning with structured light and compare the results, to analyse the results of 3D scanning and to establish how these two technologies differ in the final 3D model, to analyse which technology is faster, more accessible, and useful under different conditions. The final goal was to determine, whether there is a way to 3D scan without special equipment with a camera and free open-source software and, for the end result, to still be comparable to the end result with 3D scanning with structured light. The first step was choosing different objects for scanning. The objects differ in size, texture, colour and shape. The following step was testing both 3D scanning technologies and comparing the best results, of each object, of 3D models.

Keywords:3D capture, 3D scanning, photogrammetry, structured light scanning, 3D model

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back