izpis_h1_title_alt

Forest functions in multi-objective forest management : doctoral dissertation
ID Simončič, Tina (Author), ID Bončina, Andrej (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (27,99 MB)
MD5: 92F6C3AF510F9269CFC7DAC4DB089F3B

Abstract
We studied the importance of forest function areas and other priority areas for multi-objective forest management. The study was divided into three parts. First, we compared priority areas between the Pacific Northwest of the USA (PNW) and Central Europe (CE) by developing a conceptual framework of six dimensions (primary purpose, importance and spatial distribution of objectives, governance, permanency, spatial scale, and management regime). Secondly, we analysed the concept of forest functions in CE with a comprehensive literature overview and in-depth interviews of forestry experts. Thirdly, we evaluated the effectiveness of forest function areas in Slovenia using an on-line survey (n=162) and a participatory workshop (n=66) for forestry experts. Improvements to the concept of forest functions applied in Slovenia were captured in two alternative models (technical, conceptual), which were tested in three case study areas and evaluated by forestry experts (n=65). We confirmed that the importance of priority areas differs among the regions, especially prioritization of management objectives (mainly segregation in PNW; mainly integration in CE). The main differences among CE countries include the types of forest functions, ranking of importance, proportion of designated area and management measures associated with the selected functions. There was strong support for both technical and conceptual improvements of the concept of forest functions in Slovenia, such as fewer forest function types, prioritization of functions in the same area, less area under designation, prioritizing areas for adjusted management regimes, implementation of management measures through projects and contracts and greater participation of the public and forest owners.

Language:English
Work type:Dissertation
Typology:2.08 - Doctoral Dissertation
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[T. Simončič]
Year:2016
Number of pages:X f., 158, [12] str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-115376 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630*61+630*91+630*90(4-191.2)(497.4)(043.3)=111
URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-G3AXPYUM
COBISS.SI-ID:4333734 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:24.04.2020
Views:1007
Downloads:121
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Funkcije gozda v načrtovanju večnamenske rabe gozdnega prostora
Abstract:
Preučevali smo pomen območij s poudarjenimi funkcijami gozda in drugih prednostnih območij za večnamensko gospodarjenje z gozdovi. Oblikovali smo model za analizo prednostnih območij, ki obsega šest dimenzij (namen določanja, pomen in prostorske prioritete ciljev, upravljanje, prostorsko merilo, trajnost, gospodarjenje), in z njim primerjali prednostna območja v Pacifiškem delu S Amerike (PNW) in Srednji Evropi (SE). S študijem literature in anketiranjem gozdarskih strokovnjakov smo analizirali koncept funkcij gozda v SE. Na ravni Slovenije smo z anketiranjem gozdarskih strokovnjakov preko spleta (n=162) in na delavnici (n=66) evalvirali učinkovitost funkcij gozda za večnamensko gospodarjenje z gozdovi. Izboljšave smo predstavili v dveh alternativnih modelih, ki so jih ovrednotili gozdarski strokovnjaki (n=65), hkrati smo jih testirali na treh testnih območjih. V PNW in SE je pomen prednostnih območij za večnamensko gospodarjenje različen; razlike smo opazili pri vseh šestih dimenzijah, največje so pri prioritizaciji ciljev (pretežno segregacija v PNW; pretežno integracija v SE). Med SE deželami smo ugotovili številne podobnosti v konceptu funkcij, razlike pa so opazne v številu in tipih funkcij, rangiranju pomena funkcij, površini območij s funkcijami in določanju ukrepov za izbrane funkcije. Gozdarski strokovnjaki v Sloveniji podpirajo predlagane tehnične in konceptualne spremembe koncepta funkcij gozda. Za izboljšanje koncepta funkcij predlagamo manj tipov funkcij, poenostavljeno rangiranje, manj prekrivanja, določanje prednosti med funkcijami, določanje prioritetnih območij za prilagojeno ukrepanje, implementacijo ukrepov preko projektov in pogodb, več participacije javnosti in lastnikov gozdov.

Keywords:gozdnogospodarsko načrtovanje, funkcija gozda, prednostna območja, predlogi izboljšav, Slovenija, Srednja Evropa

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back