Analiza učinkovitosti zaščite drobnice pred napadi volkov (Canis lupus L.) v jugovzhodni in jugozahodni Sloveniji : diplomsko delo - univerzitetni študij

Muhič, Petra (author), Jerina, Klemen (mentor)

Plenjenje drobnice predstavlja težavo pri upravljanju in ohranjanju volka, saj povzroča konflikte med rejci domačih živali in volkom, ti pa so lahko težavni tako za oškodovance kot tudi za volkove. Tovrstne konflikte se namreč pogosto skuša reševati s povečanim odstrelom volkov. Drobnico se varuje z različnimi zaščitnimi sredstvi, vendar v Sloveniji še ni bila izvedena raziskava o njihovi učinkovitosti. Učinkovitost različnih sredstev za varovanje drobnice se lahko razlikuje med posameznimi območji, zato je lahko ugotovitve iz tujine tvegano prenesti k nam. V raziskavi so bila proučena zaščitna sredstva na treh različnih območjih, in sicer na Kočevskem, Notranjskem in Primorskem. Popisi so bili izvedli v treh sezonah, spomladi, poleti in jeseni, in sicer zaradi sezonskih specifik in možne selitve drobnicena različne pašnike z različnimi zaščitnimi sredstvi. V raziskavo so bili vključili 36 rejcev drobnice. Vsak popisani pašnik je bil obravnavan kot posamezna enota, ne glede na rejca in obdobje. V raziskavi je bilo spremljanih 117 enot. Na terenu se je ugotavljalo, katero vrsto varovanja rejci uporabljajo in ali uporabljajo v ograji električni tok, ter ocenjevali splošno vzdrževanje zaščite. Z univariatnimi statističnimi metodami je bilo analizirano kako učinkovita so različna zaščitna sredstva zoper napade volkov na drobnico. Proti pričakovanjem rezultati niso pokazali bistvenih razlik med različnimi zaščitnimi sredstvi. Med vsemi vrstami zaščitnih sredstev se je zaščita z žičnato električno ograjo v kombinaciji z elektromrežo izkazala za najučinkovitejšo. Majhne razlike v učinkovitosti zaščitnih sredstev nekako nakazujejo, da zaščita ni bila primerno izvedena in vestno uporabljena. Odškodnina za nastanek škode po volku se izplačuje na podlagi predpisanih zaščitnih ukrepov in sredstev, vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da so škode lahko velike, in to kljub formalnemu upoštevanju predpisov iz pravilnika o primernih načinih varovanja premoženja in vrstah ukrepov za preprečitev nadaljnje škode na premoženju. Pravilnik je torej pomanjkljivo napisan. Predlaga se dopolnitev pravilnika in uvedbo novega sistema izplačevanja odškodnin, pri katerem bodo rejci motivirani varovati svojo drobnico. Odškodnina bi se izplačevala na podlagi primernega varovanja drobnice, če ta ni varovana v skladu z novimi predpisi se ob vsaki nadaljnji prijavi škode izplača manj odškodnine. Poleg odškodnin bi država rejcem sofinancirala zaščitna sredstva in jim nudila brezplačno svetovanje o pravilni uporabi in vzdrževanju zaščitnih sredstev.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: zaščita, volk, Canis lupus, drobnica, škode
• Work type: Undergraduate thesis
• Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
• Organization: BF - Biotechnical Faculty
• Place of publishing: Ljubljana
• Publisher: [P. Muhič]
• Year: 2013
• Number of pages: IX, 77 str.
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-115180
• UDC: 630*15
• COBISS.SI-ID: 3701670
• Publication date in RUL: 15.04.2020

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: The analysis of efficiency of small ruminant protection against wolf (Canis lupus L.) attacks in southeast and southwest part of Slovenia

Abstract

Small ruminant predation may represent a problem in exercising control and preservation of the wolf. It may cause conflicts between sheep and goat breeders and wolves and represents a problem not only for breeders but for wolves as well. Such conflicts are frequently solved by increasing the cull of wolves. Small ruminants are protected by several different protective tools,however, in Slovenia there is no verification of their efficiency yet. The efficiency of the small ruminant protective tools may vary among different territories. Therefore it is too risky to transfer the research findings from abroad to our territory. In this research the small cattle protective tools were studied in three different areas: in the Kočevje, Inner Carniola and Primorska region. The survey has been conducted in the period of three seasons- in spring, summer and autumn due to the seasonal specifics and the possibility of the small cattle migration to other pastures which have different protective tools. 36 small ruminant breeders were included into research. All of the pastures under survey have been dealt with as an individual unit regardless of their owner and season. 117 units were surveyed for the purpose of the research. In the field it was tried to establish what kind of protective tools the breeders use, whether they use the electric current and evaluate the maintenance of the protective tools. With univariate statistical methods, it was tried to determine exactly how efficient the protective tools are against wolf attacks. Against the expectations the research showed that there arenʼt any essential differences between the protective tools. Among the different types of protective tools the protection with an electrical wire fence in the combination with the electrical net has proven to be the most efficient option. The relatively small differences between different types of protective tools indicate that the protection has not been appropriately executed and dutifully applied by the breeders. The compensation of the damage per wolf is payable on the basis of the statutory safeguards and resources. However, the research has shown that the damage is often substantial regardless of the formal regulations. According to the research, it has been concluded that the regulations are inadequately written. A completion to the regulations and the introduction of a new compensation payment system is suggested. This is a system which will motivate the breeders to protect their small ruminant. It is recommended that the compensation should be paid on the basis of appropriate small ruminant protection. If the small ruminant are not protected according to the new regulations, the breeders are paid a lower compensation each time they make a new report of damage. In addition to paying compensation, it is recommended that the state co-finance protective tools and provide a free consulting of how to use and maintain the protective tools properly.