izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava takojšnjih učinkov aktivnih in ostalih tehnik raztezanja zadnjih stegenskih mišic na obseg gibljivosti pri zdravih mladih ljudeh
ID Palma, Polona (Author), ID Berlot, Špela (Author), ID Puh, Urška (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (268,96 KB)
MD5: 91656E3D45E452B4ECA31BFFCED9BE19

Abstract
Uvod: Raztezanje je najpogostejša metoda, ki se uporablja za zmanjševanje ali preprečevanje mišičnih skrajšav. Raztezanje s tehnikami proprioceptivne nevromuskularne facilitacije vključuje kontrakcijo agonističnih in/ali antagonističnih mišic z namenom njihove sprostitve, kar naj bi omogočilo večji razteg agonističnih mišic. Raztezanje s tehnikami proprioceptivne nevromuskularne facilitacije naj bi bilo učinkovitejše od statičnega raztezanja za povečanje obsega giba. Namen: Pregledati izsledke raziskav o takojšnjih učinkih raztezanja s tehnikami proprioceptivne nevromuskularne facilitacije in drugih tehnik raztezanja na obseg gibljivosti pri zdravih mladih preiskovancih. Metode dela: Pregled literature je potekal v podatkovnih zbirkah PubMed, ScienceDirect, CINAHL in PEDro. Vključeni so bili randomizirani kontrolirani poskusi, v katerih so primerjali takojšnje učinke raztezanja s tehnikami proprioceptivne nevromuskularne facilitacije in statičnega ali drugih tehnik raztezanja z merjenjem obsega giba. Rezultati: Vključenih je bilo osem raziskav. V vseh so ugotavljali učinke raztezanja zadnjih stegenskih mišic. V dveh raziskavah so bili rezultati meritev obsega giba s tehnikami proprioceptivne nevromuskularne facilitacije, takoj po raztezanju boljši, v šestih raziskavah pa med uporabljenimi tehnikami ni bilo značilnih razlik. Zaključek: Raztezanje s tehnikami proprioceptivne nevromuskularne facilitacije se ni izkazalo za bolj učinkovito od drugih tehnik raztezanja v takojšnjem povečanju obsega giba.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:tehnike raztezanja, obseg giba, aktivno raztezanje, raztezanje s tehnikami proprioceptivne nevromuskularne facilitacije
Typology:1.02 - Review Article
Organization:ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Year:2019
Number of pages:Str. 57-65
Numbering:Letn. 27, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-114492 This link opens in a new window
UDC:615.825
ISSN on article:1318-2102
COBISS.SI-ID:5765227 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:03.03.2020
Views:1015
Downloads:190
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Fizioterapija
Shortened title:Fizioterapija
Publisher:Društvo fizioterapevtov Slovenije, Društvo fizioterapevtov Slovenije, Združenje fizioterapevtov Slovenije
ISSN:1318-2102
COBISS.SI-ID:30074880 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison of acute effects of active and other stretching techniques of the hamstring muscles on range of motion in young healthy people
Abstract:
Introduction: Stretching is the most common method used to reduce or prevent muscle shortening. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching techniques include muscle contraction of agonistic and/or antagonistic muscles in order to decrease neural activity in agonistic muscles, causing their relaxation, which allows more stretching of the agonistic muscles. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching techniques are regularly reported as being more effective than static stretching for increasing range of motion Purpose: Review research findings of acute effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching techniques and other stretching techniques on range of motion in healthy young adults. Methods: A literature review was conducted in databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, CINAHL and PEDro. Randomized controlled trials were included to compare the immediate effects of stretching with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques and static or other stretching techniques with range of motion measurement. Results: Eight studies were included. In all studies the stretching effect of hamstring muscles were noted. In two of them range of motion results, using the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching techniques, were in favour immediately after intervention. In six studies there was no significant difference between the stretching techniques. Conclusion: The advantages of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching techniques over other stretching techniques in immediate enhancing range of motion were not confirmed.

Keywords:streching tecniques, range of motion, active streching, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, stretching techniques

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back