Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Biodiversity in (the Natura 2000) forest habitats is not static : its conservation calls for an active management approach
ID
Kovač, Marko
(
Author
),
ID
Hladnik, David
(
Author
),
ID
Kutnar, Lado
(
Author
)
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.07.004
Image galllery
Abstract
Conservation of forest biodiversity means the managing of forest habitat types and the habitats of species in a sustainable manner. In forest habitat-type stewardship, the employment of suitable management approaches is critical. It is assumed that knowledge about the natural processes, and tree and forest habitat traits is integrated into these approaches. In addition to known techniques, forest science and practice are often recommended by diverse stakeholders to consider and introduce diverse management regimes into day-to-day management. While many of them are sound, being grounded in ecological science, some still need to be evaluated. This study was focused on the presentation of changes in the forest environment. Additionally, it addressed natural and man-made disturbances that play an important role in day-to-day management and attempted to describe differences between them from various points of view. The study also presented facts in regard to the static and dynamic approaches to biodiversity conservation (in the sense of the objective-setting process), management with forest habitat types and the assessment of their conservation status. The 91K0 % Illyrian Fagus sylvatica forest habitat types and 5130 % Juniperus communis formations on calcareous grasslands were used for exemplifying different approaches. The study revealed that the static approach to biodiversity conservation is mostly inappropriate. It also showed that unified management approaches to forest habitat types do not work because they provide different outcomes in different habitat types with different tree-species compositions.
Language:
English
Keywords:
disturbance
,
succession
,
dynamic approach
,
sustainability
,
forest management
,
biodiversity
,
Natura 2000
Typology:
1.02 - Review Article
Organization:
BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2018
Number of pages:
Str. 250-260
Numbering:
Vol. 43
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-114169
UDC:
630*61+630*19(045)=111
ISSN on article:
1617-1381
DOI:
10.1016/j.jnc.2017.07.004
COBISS.SI-ID:
4876710
Publication date in RUL:
19.02.2020
Views:
1120
Downloads:
188
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Journal for nature conservation
Shortened title:
J. nat. conserv.
Publisher:
Elsevier
ISSN:
1617-1381
COBISS.SI-ID:
336635
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
hipoteze o diverziteti
,
zaželena podoba biodiverzitete
,
ciljna vrednost kazalca
,
ohranitveno stanje
,
biodiverziteta
,
upravljanje gozdov
,
Natura 2000
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back