Načeli dispozitivnosti in oficialnosti pri urejanju premoženjskih razmerij v nepravdnem postopku

Jazbinšek, Miha (author), Galič, Aleš (mentor)

Načeli dispozitivnosti in oficialnosti sta v nepravdnih postopkih uveljavljeni v drugačnem obsegu in v drugačnem razmerju kot v pravdi, saj njihovo prilagoditev zahtevata narava in namen določenih nepravdnih postopkov. Načelo dispozitivnosti tako praviloma prevladuje v predlagalnih ali dispozitivnih nepravdnih postopkih, medtem ko načelo oficialnosti v uradnih ali oficioznih nepravdnih postopkih, vendar pa je načelo dispozitivnosti v predlagalnih postopkih uveljavljeno v manjši meri kot v pravdi. Načelo dispozitivnosti se v postopku izraža preko materialnih in procesnih dispozicij udeležencev v zvezi s predlogom in vezanostjo sodišča na vsebino predloga pri odločanju. Pri ugotavljanju, v kakšni meri je načelo dispozitivnosti uveljavljeno, je tako v ospredju predlog, razpolaganje z njim in vezanost sodišča nanj. Materialno dispozicijo predstavlja tudi sodna poravnava, ki je v predlagalnih postopkih dopuščena. Postopki za urejanje premoženjskih razmerij spadajo med predlagalne postopke, v magistrski nalogi so primeroma opisani štirje, in sicer: postopek za ureditev razmerij med solastniki, postopek za delitev stvari v solastnini, postopek za ureditev meje in postopek za ureditev nujne poti. Postopki imajo veliko skupnega, obenem pa ima vsak svoje posebnosti.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: načelo dispozitivnosti, načelo oficialnosti, nepravdni postopek, predlog, sodna poravnava, ureditev razmerij med solastniki, delitev solastnine, mejni spor, nujna pot, sodna praksa
• Work type: Master's thesis/paper
• Organization: PF - Faculty of Law
• Year: 2019
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-111122
• COBISS.SI-ID: 16981329
• Publication date in RUL: 25.09.2019

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: The principle of free disposition in the non-contentious procedures regarding property law

Abstract

The principle of free disposition and its counterpart, the ex officio principle, are in the non-contentious procedure established to a different extent and in a different ratio than they are in the civil procedure. The reason for that is in the different nature and in the different purpose of the specific non-contentious procedures. The principle of free disposition is, although to a lesser extent than in litigation, prevalent in the procedures that start solely upon party initiative (iurisdictio voluntaria contentiosa) while the ex officio principle prevails in the procedures that can be started by the court upon its own motion (iurisdictio voluntaria oficiosa). When evaluating the extent to which the principle of free disposition is established in non-contentious procedure it is necessary to investigate the petition, parties proceedings regarding the petition and if the court is bound by the petition or by the claim as determined by the claimant, if there even is one in the petition. In-court settlement is also possible in the procedures that start solely upon party initiative. The non-contentious procedures regarding property law are the procedure for the regulation of the joint property relations, the procedure for the division of joint property, the procedure in the boundary dispute and the procedure for the arrangement of the way of necessity.

• Keywords: principle of free disposition, ex officio, non-contentious procedure, in-court settlement, regulation of the joint property relations, division of joint property, boundary dispute, way of necessity, case-law