izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava zakonodaje in zahtevanih testnih metod za določanje povzročiteljev hormonskih motenj v Evropi, Združenih državah Amerike in na Japonskem
ID Kavčič, Vita (Author), ID Sollner Dolenc, Marija (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1006,92 KB)
MD5: 81A2F5968087984BA4F2F5D1A4343953

Abstract
Povzročitelji hormonskih motenj (endocrine disrupting chemicals – EDC) so kemične snovi, ki spreminjajo delovanje hormonskega sistema in negativno vplivajo na zdravje ljudi in živali. Lahko so sinteznega ali naravnega izvora. Izpostavljenost se lahko pojavi zaradi različnih virov, kot so ostanki pesticidov ali potrošniških izdelkov, ki jih uporabljamo oz. so prisotni v našem vsakdanjem življenju. V zadnjih desetletjih se je zelo povečalo zanimanje za snovi, ki delujejo na hormonski sistem. Ta interes je vodil regulativne organe po vsem svetu, da pretehtajo, ali je treba identificirati in oceniti morebitne EDC za učinke na zdravje ljudi in prosto živeče živali ter kakšna usklajena merila bi se lahko uporabila za tako oceno. V magistrski nalogi smo povzeli regulatorne smernice v Evropski Uniji (EU), Združenih državah Amerike (ZDA) in na Japonskem. Osredotočili smo se na začetke vzpostavljanja sistema za oceno tveganja za zdravje za EDC, trenutno strategijo, smernice in zahtevane preizkusne metode. Poleg primerjave teh treh delov sveta smo opisali, kako se s problemom spopadajo na globalnem nivoju s harmonizacijo postopkov, kjer smo se osredotočili na Organizacijo za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development – OECD). Ugotovili smo, da med EU, ZDA in Japonsko obstajajo razlike v zakonodaji, ki se začnejo že pri sami definiciji EDC ter programih, vpeljanih za detekcijo EDC. Medtem ko v Evropi obstajata dva seznama z dokazanimi 66 snovmi in sumljivimi 564 snovmi, pa imajo v ZDA seznam z dokazanimi 45 snovmi z endokrinim delovanjem ter na Japonskem seznam, na katerega so uvrstili 67 snovi s sumom delovanja na endokrini sistem. Prav tako so v posameznem delu sveta za EDC odgovorni različni regulativni organi – v EU je glavni organ, ki se ukvarja z EDC, Evropska agencija za kemikalije (European Chemicals Agency – ECHA), v ZDA Agencija za varstvo okolja (Environmental Protection Agency – EPA) ter na Japonskem Ministrstvo za okolje Japonske. Na področju preizkusnih smernic vsi trije predeli sveta stremijo k harmonizaciji, zato so vključeni v delo organizacije OECD na tem področju. Glavni cilj te organizacije je uskladiti preizkusne pristope, urediti regulativo in razviti nove preizkusne smernice na področju EDC na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni. Preizkusi, sestavljeni iz metod in silico, in vivo ter in vitro, so razviti znotraj dokumenta OECD - okvirja za pregledovanje in preizkušanje kemikalij, ki je sestavljen iz petih stopenj. OECD je na tem področju do zdaj naredila že znaten napredek. Primer uporabe teh preizkusov v regulativnem okviru obstaja znotraj ameriškega programa EDSP (Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program), ki uporablja potrjene preizkuse in modele za določanje motenj v endokrinem sistemu. Znaten napredek urejanja tega področja je naredila tudi Evropska komisija, saj je po dolgih letih razprav konec leta 2017 le sprejela dva pravna akta: Delegirano uredbo komisije (EU) 2017/2100 (2) in Uredbo Komisije (EU) 2018/605 (3), v katerih so določili znanstvena merila za ocenjevanje EDC. Z njimi so postavili zahtevo, da za vse snovi, ki se uporabljajo pri proizvodnji biocidnih proizvodov ter aktivne snovi, varovala in sinergiste, ki se uporabljajo pri proizvodnji fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, preveri, ali le te nimajo lastnosti EDC. To nadgrajuje dosedanje možnosti omejitve snovi, ki imajo tovrstne lastnosti v okviru Uredbe 1907/2006 REACH, ki se nanaša na vse snovi, proizvedene ali uvožene v EU, in postavlja kriterije za preverbo potencialnih lastnosti EDC tudi za vse preostale snovi, ki se uporabljajo v različne namene. V prihodnosti lahko pričakujemo, da se bodo ta znanstvena merila upoštevala globalno.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:EDC, zakonodaja, preizkusne metode, EU, ZDA, Japonska, OECD
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:FFA - Faculty of Pharmacy
Year:2019
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-110655 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:18.09.2019
Views:905
Downloads:199
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison of legislation and required methods for determining hormonal disorders in Europe, United States of America and Japan
Abstract:
Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are chemicals that alter the function of the endocrine system and have a negative affect on human and animal health. They may be of synthetic or natural origin. Exposure can occur due to various sources, such as pesticide residues or consumer products that are used or present in our daily lives. In recent decades, there has been an increased interest in chemicals that act on the endocrine system. This interest has led regulators worldwide to consider whether potential EDCs should be identified and evaluated for their effects on human and wildlife health and what harmonized criteria could be used to make such an assessment. The Master's thesis summarizes the regulatory guidelines in Europe, the US (United States of America) and Japan. We focused on the beginnings of setting up a health risk assessment system for EDC, the current strategy, guidelines and the required test methods. In addition to comparing these three parts of the world, we described how they deal with the problem globally by harmonizing procedures, where we focused on the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). We have found that there are differences in legislation between Europe, the US and Japan, starting with the very definition of EDC itself and the programs introduced for EDC detection. While in Europe there are two lists with proven 66 substances and suspected 564 substances, in the USA they have a list of proven 45 substances with endocrine action and in Japan a list that lists 67 substances with suspected endocrine function. Different regulatory bodies are also responsible for each part of the world - in Europe the main body dealing with EDC is the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), in the USA the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and in Japan, the Ministry of the Environment of Japan. In the field of test guidelines, all three parts of the world are striving for harmonization and are therefore involved in the work of the OECD. The main objective of this organization is to harmonize test approaches, regulate regulations and develop new test guidelines in the field of EDC nationally and internationally. Tests consisting of methods in silico, in vivo and in vitro are developed within the OECD document of the OECD Conceptual Framework for Testing and Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters, which consists of five stages. The OECD has already made significant progress in this area. An example of the use of these tests in a regulatory framework exists within the US Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP), which uses validated tests and models to determine endocrine disruption. The European Commission has also made significant progress in regulating this area, since after many years of debate, at the end of 2017, it adopted two pieces of legislation: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2100 (2) and Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/605 (3), which set out the scientific criteria for EDC evaluation. They requested that all substances used in the production of biocidal products, as well as the active substances, safeners and synergists used in the production of plant protection products, should be verified as having no EDC properties. This builds on the existing possibilities of limiting substances with these properties under REACH Regulation 1907/2006, which applies to all substances manufactured or imported into the EU, and sets criteria for verifying the potential properties of EDCs for all other substances used in different purposes. In the future, we can expect these scientific criteria to be taken into account globally.

Keywords:EDC, legislation, test methods, EU, USA, Japan, OECD

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back