Sustainable development (SD) is one of the global and central aims of today’s politics. Different agendas have been developed to promote sustainability and make it a political goal worldwide. As stated in Agenda 21, education has to play an essential role in achieving a sustainable society.
The research was focused on understanding and knowledge about SD and education for sustainable development (ESD) by Slovenian and Austrian biology teacher students, and comparing the results between the two countries. Another aim of our research was to determine pre-service teachers pedagogical content knowledge (PCK).
The research was carried out at the University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Home Economic and at the University of Vienna, Centre for Teacher Education.
60 Slovenian pre-service biology teachers and 60 Austrian pre-service biology teachers were interviewed for our study. Pre-service biology teachers answered a set of closed, Likert-type and open survey-questions that were analysed both, qualitatively and quantitatively. The questionnaire was in Slovenian and German language. The closed and Likert questions were analysed statistically. We were using the following methods: T-test (Independent Samples) and A chi-square test. Open questions were analysed qualitatively with the process of coding. We used deductive and inductive coding methods.
Pre-service biology teachers from Slovenia and Austria have a good understanding of the environmental approach of sustainability, but lack interconnections between the environmental, economic and social concerns related to SD. They describe and connect ESD with environmental education and environmental awareness. The most frequent sources of knowledge for Slovenian pre-service teachers were the second subject of study (chemistry or home economics). The most frequently mentioned source of knowledge for Austrian pre-service teachers were biology study and other sources, such as mass media or personal information channel. Pre-service teachers from both countries had strong positive attitudes about implementing ESD in their future classes. The difference between pre-service teachers in the two countries was not statistically significant regarding knowledge of, and attitudes to ESD. Students from both countries know the pedagogical principles of ESD, such as active learning and transformative education.
Results of the research contribute to evaluation and development of curriculum for middle and high school biology teachers.
|