izpis_h1_title_alt

Upravljanje in vodenje v rudniških nesrečah: primerjalna analiza nesreč Čile 2010 in Turčija 2014
ID Benedik, Kristijan (Author), ID Juvan, Jelena (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1023,31 KB)
MD5: 9EF2517739A89326B78DD1CF06722825

Abstract
V državah z veliko rudnih bogastev so nesreče v rudnikih na žalost nekaj povsem običajnega, zato jih mediji največkrat niti ne omenjajo. Vsake toliko časa pa se zgodi nesreča, ki s kakšno od svojih podrobnosti odstopa od vsakdanjih rudniških nesreč. Rudniški nesreči v Čilu in Turčiji sta v svetovni javnosti zbudili veliko zanimanja. Razloga pa sta bila različna. V primeru nesreče v Čilu so vseh 33 ujetih rudarjev po večmesečnem reševanju uspeli rešiti, medtem ko je glede na število žrtev v Turčiji prišlo do najhujše rudniške nesreče v njihovi moderni zgodovini. Povod za obe nesreči je bil v obeh primerih človeški dejavnik. Zakaj se posledice med obema nesrečama razlikujejo? Razloga sta predvsem dva: vzrok nesreče v posameznem rudniku in pa sistem kriznega upravljanja in vodenja v posamezni državi (preventivni ukrepi, odzivnost akterjev, pripravljenost in izkušenost). Skupno obema nesrečama pa je neupoštevanje preventivnih ukrepov, prevzem kriznega upravljanja in vodenja državnih akterjev in po končani reševalni akciji zaprtje obeh rudnikov.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:rudniška nesreča, krizno upravljanje in vodenje, tehnološke in tehnične nesreče.
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:2018
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-104383 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:35913565 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:05.10.2018
Views:1975
Downloads:344
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Crisis management in mining accidents: comperative analysis of Chile 2010 and Turkey 2014
Abstract:
Unfortunately, in countries with a lot of mineral resources, the accidentds in the mines are something that happens often. That is the reason why they are usually not even mentioned in the media. But every now and then, there is an accident that deviates with its details from another mining accidents. Mining accidents in Chile and Turkey attracted a lot of interest in public, but the reasons were different. In Chile mining accident all of the 33 trapped miners were saved after months of rescue attempst, while according to the number of victims, Turkey accident was the worst of it`s kind in their modern history. Human factor was the cause in both accidents. Why are the consequences between two disasters differnet? There are mainly two reasons: the cause of the accident and sistem of crisis management in each country (preventive measures, responsivnes, preperdnes and experience). Both disasters include failure of preventive measures, crisis management was taken over by national institutions and closure of both mines.

Keywords:mine accident, crisis management, technological and technical disasters

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back