Zastaranje kazenskega pregona

Miklavčič, Saša (author), Filipčič, Katja (mentor)

To magistrsko delo izpostavlja in komentira nekonsistentnosti slovenskega Kazenskega zakonika in odločitev Ustavnega sodišča RS na področju zastaranja kazenskega pregona. Komentira nadpovprečno dolžino rokov za zastaranje. Kritično predstavlja koncept zastaranja kazenskega pregona in združljivost institutov zadržanja ter pretrganja zastaralnih rokov s posameznim konceptom. Obravnava tudi veljavno ureditev (KZ-1) samega načina teka rokov zastaranja kazenskega pregona, še posebej ob prisotnosti okoliščine mladoletnega oškodovanca, pa tudi pri trajajočih in nadaljevanih kaznivih dejanjih. Dotika se tudi vprašanj povezave nastanka prepovedane posledice in kaznivosti z zastaranjem kazenskega pregona ter povezave učinka pravnomočnosti s koncem teka zastaralnega roka. Navsezadnje pa predstavlja tudi različne pristope k vprašanju retroaktivne uporabe podaljšanih rokov.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: Zastaranje kazenskega pregona, zadržanje in pretrganje zastaranja, koncept zastaranja, mladoletni oškodovanec, prepovedana posledica.
• Work type: Master's thesis/paper
• Organization: PF - Faculty of Law
• Year: 2018
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-103965
• COBISS.SI-ID: 16387665
• Publication date in RUL: 29.09.2018

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: Limitation period for criminal prosecution

Abstract

This Master's Thesis presents and comments on the inconsistencies of the Slovenian Criminal Code and decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia regarding the statute of limitation for criminal prosecution. It also comments the above average duration of the limitation period. It presents, in a critical manner, the concept of limitation period for criminal prosecution and the compatibility of the institution of suspension and interruption of limitation periods with individual concepts. It also deals with the regulation in force (KZ-1) regarding the manner of determining the limitation periods for criminal prosecution, especially in cases of a victim who is a minor, as well as cases of continuing and ongoing criminal offences. It also touches upon the matter of connecting the prohibited consequence and liability with the statute of limitations for criminal prosecution as well as connecting the effects of res judicata with the end of the limitation period. Finally, it also presents different approaches to the matter of retroactive application of extended periods.

• Keywords: Statute of limitations for criminal prosecution, suspension and interruption of the limitation period, the concept of the statue of limitations, minor victim, prohibited consequence.