Primerjava vsebine in oblike občinskih prostorskih aktov v zakonodaji sprejeti po osamosvojitvi Slovenije : diplomska naloga

Cvetko, Aljana (author), Zavodnik Lamovšek, Alma (mentor), Foški, Mojca (comentor)

V diplomski nalogi smo analizirali in ovrednotili spremembe treh zakonov, ki so bili na področju urejanja prostora sprejeti v času samostojne Slovenije: Zakon o urejanju prostora (ZUreP-1, 2003), Zakon o prostorskem načrtovanju (ZPNačrt, 2007) in Zakon o urejanju prostora (ZUreP-2, 2017). Pregledali in primerjali smo vlogo prostorskih aktov v sistemu urejanja prostora, predstavili vsebino in obliko občinskih prostorskih aktov za posamezen zakon ter medsebojno primerjali občinske prostorske akte po vsebini in obliki. S primerjavo smo preverili tezo, da postaja vsebina občinskega prostorskega akta z vsakim zakonom skromnejša, oblika prostorskega akta pa se vse bolj prilagaja digitalnim podatkom in razpoložljivi tehnologiji. Teze v celoti nismo mogli potrditi ali zavrniti, saj se ZUreP-2 še ne izvaja ter nimamo na razpolago pravilnikov o točni obliki in vsebini občinskih prostorskih aktov. Tezo smo le delno potrdili, da je vsebina nekoliko skromnejša po ZPNačrt v odnosu do ZUreP-1, oblika pa ostaja precej podobna.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: prostorski akt, občinski prostorski akt, ZUreP-1, ZPNačrt, ZUreP-2, zakonodaja, zakon, pravilnik
• Work type: Bachelor thesis/paper
• Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
• Organization: FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
• Publisher: [A. Cvetko]
• Year: 2018
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-103715
• UDC: 71:328.34(497.4)(043.2)
• COBISS.SI-ID: 8555873
• Publication date in RUL: 23.09.2018

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: The Comparison of the Content and Form of the Municipal Spatial Acts in the Legislation Adopted after the Independence of Slovenia : graduation thesis

Abstract

In the thesis, we analysed and evaluated amendments of three Acts, which were adopted in the field of spatial management, in the period of independent Slovenia: the Spatial Management Act (ZUreP-1, 2003), the Spatial Planning Act (ZPNačrt, 2007) and the Spatial Management Act (ZUreP-2, 2017). We examined and compared the role of Spatial Acts in the Spatial Management System, we introduced the content and form of Municipal Spatial Acts for a specific Act, and carried out an inter-comparison of Municipal Spatial Acts according to content and form. With the comparison, we tested the thesis that the content of the Municipal Spatial Act is becoming modest with every Act and that the form of the Spatial Act is adopting to the digital data and available technology. We could not completely confirm or reject the thesis since the ZUreP-2 is still not implemented and there are no available Rules about the exact form and content of Municipal Spatial Acts. The thesis was only partly confirmed that the content is somewhat modest according to the ZPNačrt in relation to the ZUreP-1, and the form remains considerably similar.

• Keywords: Spatial Act, Municipal Spatial Act, ZUreP-1, ZPNačrt, ZUreP-2, Legislation, Act, Rules