izpis_h1_title_alt

Dimenzioniranje skalometov v obalnem inženirstvu : diplomska naloga
ID Čehovin, Jerneja (Author), ID Žagar, Dušan (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,39 MB)
MD5: 0A147C3DE071BF2F41B8D8225C1FF65C

Abstract
V diplomski nalogi smo opisali in primerjali tri metode za dimenzioniranje skalometov za zaščito morske obale: metode Iribarren, Hudson in Van der Meer. V prvem delu naloge smo prikazali teoretično ozadje vseh omenjenih metod, v drugem delu pa smo na podlagi izmišljenih, a verjetnih podatkov in programskega orodja MS Excel prikazali kako metode delujejo, jih primerjali in spoznali odstopanja med njimi. Vse tri metode med seboj niso neposredno primerljive. V enakih valovnih pogojih je teža posameznega kamna po metodi Iribarren približno dvakrat manjša od teže določene po metodi Hudson, razlika v najvišjem valu, ki ga prenesejo kamni enake teže pa znaša 20 – 30%. Trajanje valov, ki povzročajo 5, 20 in 30% poškodbe na skalometih dimenzioniranih po metodi Iribarren in Hudson se razlikuje tudi za velikostni razred.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:skalomet, stabilnost, metoda Iribarren, metoda Hudson, metoda Van der Meer
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Publisher:[J. Čehovin]
Year:2018
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-103612 This link opens in a new window
UDC:627.05/.06:004.2(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:8551009 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:20.09.2018
Views:1322
Downloads:368
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Rock armour designing in coastal engineering : graduation thesis
Abstract:
In the thesis we describe and compare three methods used for rock armour designing in coastal engineering: the methods Iribarren, Hudson and Van der Meer. Firstly we describe the theoretical background of all three methods. In the second part we describe the application of methods and compare them using fictitious, but probable data in MS Excel software tool. The results depict the difference between methods. The three methods are not directly comparable. The Hudson method results in approximately a two-fold heavier individual rock in the same wave conditions, while the maximum wave for rocks of equal weight differs for 20 – 30%. The duration of a storm causing 5, 20 and 30% damage on the rock armour designed following the Iribarren and Hudson methods disagrees for even an order of magnitude.

Keywords:rock armour, stability, method Iribarren, method Hudson, method Van der Meer

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back