Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Odgovornost prevoznika po Konvenciji o pogodbi za mednarodni prevoz tovora po cesti
ID
Mesesnel, Maša
(
Author
),
ID
Podobnik, Klemen
(
Mentor
)
More about this mentor...
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(941,98 KB)
MD5: C88A19F6D603E8AC8A68B959E3DD09FE
Image galllery
Abstract
Odgovornost prevoznika je eno temeljnih vprašanj, s katerim so se ukvarjali ustvarjalci ob pripravljanju CMR konvencije. Prevoznik odgovarja za škodo, ki nastane v posebej določenem časovnem okviru. Časovni okvir predstavlja obdobje od prevzema tovora v prevzemnem kraju do dostave tovora v namembni kraj. Na podlagi CMR konvencije je odgovornost prevoznika vzpostavljena za poškodbo ali izgubo tovora ter za zamudo pri dostavi. Obstoj škode mora dokazati tožnik. Izključitev odgovornosti prevoznika je možna na podlagi splošnih oprostilnih ali posebnih privilegiranih razlogov. Obstoj teh razlogov za izključitev odgovornosti je dolžan dokazovati prevoznik. Vendar izključitev odgovornosti prevoznika nikakor ne pride v poštev, v kolikor je prevoznik ravnal zlonamerno (wilful misconduct) ali v taki opustitvi, ki jo pristojno sodišče šteje za zlonamerno (wilful misconduct). Prevoznik, ki je spoznan za odgovornega za nastanek škodnega dogodka, je dolžan plačati odškodnino. Na tem mestu ne pridejo v poštev splošna pravila obligacijskega prava, saj bi za prevoznika predstavljala preveliko finančno breme. CMR konvencija nudi višinske omejitve pri izplačilu odškodnine. Višinska omejitev je odvisna od oblike škodnega dogodka, za katerega odgovarja prevoznik (poškodba, izguba, zamuda pri dostavi). Iz preučevanja sodne prakse je razvidno, da uporaba določb CMR konvencije ni poenotena, saj imajo sodišča pri svojem odločanju preveč manevrskega prostora.
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
transportno pravo
,
odgovornost prevoznika
,
splošni oprostilni razlogi
,
posebni privilegirani oprostilni razlogi
,
višinska omejitev odškodnine
Work type:
Master's thesis/paper
Organization:
PF - Faculty of Law
Year:
2018
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-103577
COBISS.SI-ID:
16359505
Publication date in RUL:
20.09.2018
Views:
5572
Downloads:
917
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
MESESNEL, Maša, 2018,
Odgovornost prevoznika po Konvenciji o pogodbi za mednarodni prevoz tovora po cesti
[online]. Master’s thesis. [Accessed 23 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=103577
Copy citation
Share:
Secondary language
Language:
English
Title:
Carrier's Liability under the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road
Abstract:
The Carrier’s liability was one of the fundamental issues that creators were dealing with during the preparation of CMR Convention. The carrier is liable for damage arising in special time frame. The time frame of carrier’s liability represents the period from takingover the cargo at receiving point to the delivery of the cargo at its destination. According to the provisions of CMR Convention carrier is liable for any loss or damage which happens in that specific time frame and also for damage which occure, because of delay in delivery. The plaintif must prove the existence of the damage. The carrier can also relieve himself of liability. He must prove the existence of circumstances according to Article 17(2) of CMR Convention or existence of special risks under Article 17(4) of CMR Convention. Exclusion of carrier’s liability is by no means possible if damage was caused by his wilful misconduct of by such default as, in accordance with the law of the court, is considered as equivalent to wilful misconduct. The carrier who is found responsible for the occurance of damage is obliged to pay compensation. Transport law is special legal branch so we can not apply the general rules of the law of obligations. CMR Convention contains special provisions that limit the amount of carrier’s liability. The height of the limit depends on form of damage (loss, damage, delay in delivery). Review of case law shows that the application of provisions of CMR Convention is still not unified especially, because the courts have too much room for maneuver in making decisions.
Keywords:
transport law
,
carrier’s liability
,
general risks
,
special risks
,
limitation of the carrier’s liability
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Searching for similar works...
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back