Details

Ocenjevanje standardne napake in intervalov zaupanja z metodo bootstrap
ID GAŠPARAC, GRETA (Author), ID Štrumbelj, Erik (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,13 MB)
MD5: 0EFEB4DF2CBA04A81C7943108B54926C

Abstract
V diplomskem delu predstavimo metodo bootstrap, ki jo uvrščamo v družino metod samovzorčenja ter je preprostejša in bolj intuitivna alternativa tradicionalnim statističnim metodam za ocenjevanje negotovosti. Osredotočimo se na neparametrično različico metode. Opišemo njene lastnosti in jih predstavimo s praktičnimi primeri s področja strojnega učenja - ocenjevanje in primerjava različnih modelov. Izpostavimo tudi šibke točke metode. Predstavimo in primerjamo tri intervale zaupanja bootstrap: standardnega normalnega z uporabo standardne napake bootstrap in dva klasična intervala bootstrap, centilnega in BCa. Pričakovano se v večini primerov najbolje obnese BCa.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:metoda bootstrap, standardna napaka, intervali zaupanja
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FRI - Faculty of Computer and Information Science
Year:2018
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-103206 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:14.09.2018
Views:1650
Downloads:480
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
GAŠPARAC, GRETA, 2018, Ocenjevanje standardne napake in intervalov zaupanja z metodo bootstrap [online]. Bachelor’s thesis. [Accessed 14 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=103206
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Boostraping standard errors and confidence intervals
Abstract:
We introduce the reader to the bootstrap, a simple and flexible resampling-based alternative for quantifying uncertainty. We describe the basic characteristics of the non-parametric bootstrap and illustrate its practical behaviour with simulations in the context of a typical task in machine learning - estimating and comparing the performance of different prediction models. We also present some of the method's weaknesses. We introduce and compare three standard intervals: the standard normal using bootstrap standard error and two more typical bootstrap confidence intervals, the percentile and the BCa interval. As theory suggests, the BCa performs the best over a wide range of situations.

Keywords:bootstrap, standard error, confidence intervals

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
  1. Konstrukcija intervalov zaupanja z metodami ponovnega vzorčenja - kljukčeva metoda
  2. Strategije cenovne diskriminacije
  3. Confidence intervals for the Mann-Whitney test
  4. Smallest confidence intervals for one binomial proportion
  5. Parameters' confidence intervals evaluation for heterogeneous strain field specimen designs by using digital image correlation
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
  1. THE INFLUENCE OF CONFIDENCE ON DECISION MAKING ABOUT THE CHOICE OF AN INSURANCE BROKER
  2. Nedenarno spodbujanje inovativnosti
  3. Merjenje dolžine v prvem razredu
  4. Analiza kakovosti odkovkov z metodo FMEA
  5. Using association rules for classification - A comparison of different algorithms

Back