izpis_h1_title_alt

Bralna pismenost študentov Pedagoške fakultete : diplomsko delo
ID Cimerman, Alenka (Author), ID Skubic, Darija (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://pefprints.pef.uni-lj.si/5255/ This link opens in a new window

Abstract
V diplomskem delu sem se osredinila na bralno pismenost bodočih pedagoških delavcev. V teoretičnem delu sem predstavila pojma pismenost in bralna pismenost. Opisala sem pomen vseživljenjskega razvijanja bralne pismenosti in pomen bralne pismenosti za pedagoške delavce. Predstavila sem tudi rezultate najpomembnejših raziskav na področju bralne pismenosti ter vsebino strateških dokumentov, ki določajo prioritete in cilje vzgojno-izobraževalne politike na tem področju. V empiričnem delu sem raziskala bralno pismenost študentov pedagoške fakultete. Ugotavljala sem, ali obstajajo med njimi glede na smer študija statistično pomembne razlike v obvladovanju bralne pismenosti. Ugotavljala sem tudi, kako anketirani bodoči pedagogi ocenjujejo lasten interes za branje in ali menijo, da je vseživljenjsko razvijanje bralne pismenosti za pedagoške delavce pomembno. V raziskavo je bilo vključenih 92 študentov 1. letnikov dodiplomskega študija Pedagoške fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani. Uporabljena je bila deskriptivna in kavzalna – neekperimentalna metoda pedagoškega raziskovanja. Rezultate sem prikazala in interpretirala s pomočjo tabel, grafikonov in v opisni obliki. Za ugotavljanje statistično pomembnih razlik med študenti glede na smer študija sem uporabila hi-kvadrat preizkus hipoteze neodvisnosti. Analiza je pokazala, da hipotezi 1 in 2 ovržem, hipotezo 3 pa potrdim. Z raziskavo sem ugotovila, kakšna je bralna pismenost anketiranih bodočih pedagogov ter v kolikšni meri anketiranci menijo, da je vseživljenjsko razvijanje bralne pismenosti za pedagoške delavce pomembno. Na podlagi izsledkov sem nato izpeljala nekatere sklepe za izboljšanje stanja.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:bralna pismenost, vseživljenjsko razvijanje bralne pismenosti, bodoči pedagoški delavci, Nacionalna strategija za razvoj bralne pismenosti
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Publisher:[A. Cimerman]
Year:2018
Number of pages:57 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-102509 This link opens in a new window
UDC:028-057.875(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:12097865 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:18.09.2018
Views:1383
Downloads:247
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Reading literacy of students at the Faculty of education
Abstract:
In my diploma thesis, I focus on reading literacy of future education experts. In the theoretical part, I have defined literacy and reading literacy. Further, I described the importance of lifelong development of reading literacy and the importance of reading literacy for education experts. Then I presented the findings of the most important researches in the field of reading literacy and the content of strategic documents that determine the priorities and aims of educational politics in this field. In the empirical part of my thesis, I have researched the reading literacy of students who study at The Faculty of Education. I established the occurrence of statistically significant differences in their ability to master reading literacy depending on study course they attend. I have also researched how motivated are the interviewed students to read and their opinion on how important is lifelong development of reading literacy for educators. In my survey, I included 92 1st year students of The Faculty of Education of the University of Ljubljana. I used the descriptive and the causal – non-experimental method in educational research and then presented and interpreted the results with tables, graphs and in descriptive form. To establish statistically significant differences among students depending on their study course I used Chi-Square Test of Independence. The analysis has shown that I can reject hypothesis 1 and 2 and accept hypothesis 3. With this survey, I researched the reading literacy of interviewed future education experts and their opinion on lifelong development of reading literacy for educators. Based on my analysis, I summed up conclusions and suggested some possible solutions that could lead to improvement in this field.

Keywords:literacy, pismenost

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back