izpis_h1_title_alt

Odškodninska odgovornost za zdravniške napake: Primerjava med slovenskim in italijanskim pravom
ID Nardin, Kristina (Author), ID Možina, Damjan (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (793,89 KB)
MD5: 1BE0FA906086F19A6D5BCEB4EE377DBC

Abstract
Reforma Gelli-Bianco je na področju odškodninske odgovornosti za zdravniške napake v Italiji uvedla dvotirni sistem odškodninske odgovornosti za zdravniške napake. Tako sta zdravstvena ustanova zasebne ali javne narave ter zdravnik z zasebno ambulanto pogodbeno odgovorni pacientu. Zdravnik, ki pa zdravstvene storitve opravlja v okviru zdravstvene ustanove, je za napake pacientu deliktno odgovoren. V Sloveniji je, z izjemo ravnanj zdravnika v primeru nujne gestije, odgovornost za zdravniške napake utemeljena na pogodbenem temelju. Državi sta si med seboj različni tudi glede načina izračuna višine zneska odškodnine za nepremoženjsko škodo. Italijanski pravni red pozna sistem tabel, ki s pomočjo odstotnih točk določi obseg nastale škode, s pomočjo katerega se nato z uporabo tabel in upoštevanjem ostalih okoliščin določi višina odškodnine. Tabel, na katere bi se zdravnik skliceval pri določanju višine odškodnine v slovenskem pravu ni, saj se praviloma za neprmoženjsko škodo odmeri »pravična denarna odškodnina« v vsakem primeru posebej. Kljub določenim razlikam pravna reda obeh držav temeljita na istih temeljnih vrednotah, saj bi oškodovanec v primeru zdravniške napake tako v italijanskem kot slovenskem pravnem redu najbrž lahko dosegel poplačilo za škodo, ki mu je z zdravniško napako nastala.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:zdravniška napaka, zdravniška odgovornost, pogodbena odgovornost, nepogodbena odgovornost, skrbnost, dokazno breme, premoženjska škoda, nepremoženjska škoda, povrnitev škode, metoda izračuna višine odškodnine za nepremoženjsko škodo
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2018
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-101958 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:16253777 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:15.07.2018
Views:4027
Downloads:899
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Damage liability for medical errors: Comparison between Slovenian and Italian law
Abstract:
In the field of damage liability for medical errors, the Gelli-Bianco reform in Italy introduced twin-track system of damage liability for medical errors. Therefore, private or public healthcare institution and doctor with private practice are contractually liable to the patient. A doctor performing healthcare services within the healthcare institution is directly liable to the patient. With the exception of emergency action, in Slovenia responsibility for medical errors is based on the contractual foundation. The two countries also differ regarding the calculation method of the amount of compensation for non-pecuniary damage. Italian legal order has a system of tables that determines the extent of the damage incurred using percentages. Based on that and use of tables as well as considering other circumstances, the amount of compensation is determined. Slovenian legal order has no tables to which a doctor would refer to when determining amount of compensation, since, as a general rule, “fair financial compensation” is assessed for non-pecuniary damage in each individual case. Despite certain differences, legal orders of both countries are based on the same fundamental values, as the person suffering damage in case of medical error would probably obtain compensation for the damage caused by the medial error in Italian as well as Slovenian legal order.

Keywords:medical error, medical liability, contractual liability, tort liability, professional standards, burden of proof, pecuniary loss, non-pecuniary loss, compensation of damages, calculation method of the amount of compensation for non-pecuniary loss

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back