izpis_h1_title_alt

OBRAVNAVA OSEB Z DUŠEVNIMI MOTNJAMI IN OPRAVILNO NESPOSOBNIH V UPRAVNIH POSTOPKIH
ID POGAČAR, ŠPELA (Author), ID Kovač, Polonca (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,35 MB)
MD5: A4AE9C675DEA227182E086EAE6E575E4

Abstract
Že Ustava Republike Slovenije v 1. odst. 14. člena določa, da so v Sloveniji vsakomur zagotovljene enake človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine ne glede na narodnost, raso, spol, jezik, vero, politično ali drugo prepričanje, gmotno stanje, rojstvo, izobrazbo, družbeni položaj, invalidnost ali katerokoli drugo osebno okoliščino. Glavna usmeritev mojega diplomskega dela izhaja iz dejstva, da se vsem zagotovi enako varstvo pravic. Diplomsko delo tako izpostavlja položaj strank, ki ne razumejo pomena svojih dejanj v postopku, na račun tega opustijo določeno nujno ravnanje ali pa se vzdržijo izjav, ki bi jih morale dati, kjer je moč poudariti, da je takim strankam organ dolžan pomagati. Diplomsko delo analizira situacijo na področju »urejenosti« skrbništva v Sloveniji in s tem prepoznava probleme, ki se pojavljajo v praksi. Institut skrbništva je nujen in ključen element posameznikov z odvzeto poslovno sposobnostjo. Skozi celoten postopek diplomskega dela pa se tudi ugotavlja, kako globoko gre lahko pravica organa v osebnost posameznika, njegovo osebno sfero glede na varstvo njegovih pravic. Na podlagi opravljene študije v okviru diplomskega dela ugotavljam, da v slovenskem prostoru z obstoječo zakonodajo, ki seveda določa okvire delovanja upravnim organom, ni v zadostni meri in dovolj učinkovito poskrbljeno za pravno varstvo oseb z omejeno ali odvzeto poslovno sposobnostjo. Na podlagi tega ugotavljam, da je v Sloveniji na tem področju nujna nova, moderna in učinkovita zakonodaja, hkrati pa je moč trditi, da Družinski zakonik v okviru določb glede odvzema poslovne sposobnosti prinaša zgolj malenkostne razlike, vidne le v pristopu, pravno formalno pa zadeva ostaja nespremenjena.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:poslovna sposobnost, skrbništvo, skrbnik, zagovorništvo, poslovna sposobnost, odvzem poslovne sposobnosti, upravni postopek
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
Year:2018
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-101545 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:14.06.2018
Views:2744
Downloads:494
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:WORKING THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES WITH THE MENTALLY ILL AND LEGALLY INCAPACITATED
Abstract:
Even the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia, under Article 14, Paragraph 1 defines that in Slovenia everyone shall be guaranteed equal human rights and fundamental freedoms irrespective of national origin, race, sex, language, religion, political, or other conviction, material standing, birth, education, social status, disability, or any other personal circumstance. The main point of my diploma thesis originates from the fact that everyone shall be guaranteed equal protection of rights. For that reason, the diploma thesis discusses the position of parties, who do not understand the meaning of their actions in a procedure, thereby forgoing certain urgent actions or refraining from any statements that they should make, so it’s worth pointing out that authorities are obliged to help such parties. The diploma thesis analyses the situation in the area of “regulation” of guardianship in Slovenia to identify the problems that appear in practice. The concept of guardianship is an urgent and key element of an individual, who was deprived of his or her operating capacity. Throughout the thesis, we are trying to determine how far can a right of an authority body go into the personality of an individual, his or her personal sphere with regard to the protection of that person’s rights. On the basis of the study carried out within the framework of undergraduate thesis, I conclude that in Slovenia, the existing legislation which naturally determines the operating framework of the regulatory authorities, fails to provide sufficient and effective legal protection for persons with limited legal capacity or persons who have been deprived of their legal capacity. Therefore, I conclude that Slovenia needs a new, modern and effective legislation in this area, whereas it can also be argued that within the framework of the provisions, the Family Code brings about only minor differences that can only be observed in the approach, while legally and formally the issue remains unchanged.

Keywords:operating capacity, guardianship, guardian, advocacy, legal capacity, loss of legal capacity, administrative procedure

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back