The subject of this research is to show the high-school students' attitude towards Art and how does that change after teaching Art with poststructuralistic methods. In theoreticall part we will examine the differences between historical, modern and contemporary Art. In the past the main aspect of Art was to produce artworks that were mimethically correct. With the rise of Modernism at the end of 19. century Art began to follow ideologies, that artists' defined by them selves. We can interpret classical and modern Art with traditional methods, but if that is the subject of interpretation of contemporary Art, the interpretation is faulty due to differences between the nature of classic and contemporary Art, wich has alienated from the past doctrines, and is by it's nature pluralistic. Therefore we find a research problem, wich is how to accurately interprete contemporary Artworks in Art classes. We will be working with new approaches, that will allow Students to understand contemporary Art. We will analyse how does Students' attitude towards Art change after learning contemporary Art's contents and after confronting them with contemporary authentic Artwork. Our research subjet will be based on how students understand Artworks if we aproach the interpretation poststructuralisticaly. We will do an Actions research, by wich we will plan steps with the intention of profounding praxis. We will check the effects of analysing the contents of Artworks.
|
