izpis_h1_title_alt

Vpliv psihiatričnega in psihološkega izvedenskega mnenja na izid kazenskega postopka
Stojanović, Tanja (Author), Šugman Stubbs, Katja (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (362,04 KB)
MD5: 49191E22F1145121F6F316AF9FFBBA13

Abstract
Magistrska naloga obravnava delo izvedenca psihiatra in izvedenca psihologa, odnos sodišča do izvedenca in vpliv izvedenskega mnenja na izid kazenskega postopka. (Pre)pogosto sodniki izvedence naslavljajo z vprašanji onkraj zakonskega okvirja, iz česar je mogoče prepoznati sodnikovo neodločnost, ko se v stiski zateče k izvedencu in od njega pričakuje odgovore na vprašanja, ki bi jih moral oblikovati sam. Delo tako opozarja na pomembnost ločevanja med funkcijo izvedenca in funkcijo sodnika, saj se sodniki v mnogih primerih popolnoma oprejo na izvedensko mnenje, v obrazložitvi pa v zvezi s tem ne podajo lastne dokazne ocene, temveč zgolj prepišejo del izvedenskega mnenja. V raziskovalnem delu naloge so predstavljene ugotovitve glede vpliva izvedenskega mnenja na izid kazenskega postopka, ki temeljijo na podlagi vpogleda v selekcionirane sodne spise na Okrožnem sodišču v Ljubljani. Pregled kazenskih zadev je pokazal, da je vpliv izvedenca psihiatra in izvedenca psihologa na izid kazenskega postopka velik, kar odpira vprašanje, ali je obdolžencu resnično omogočen pošten postopek.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:izvedensko mnenje, izid kazenskega postopka, vpliv na kazenski postopek, izvedenec psihiater, izvedenec psiholog, forenzična psihologija, forenzična psihiatrija
Work type:Master's thesis/paper (mb22)
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2020
COBISS.SI-ID:17137233 This link opens in a new window
Views:485
Downloads:238
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only to logged in users.
:
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Impact of psychiatric and psychological expert opinion on the outcome of criminal proceedings
Abstract:
This master's thesis addresses the work of the psychiatric and psychological court appointed expert, the court's attitude towards the court appointed expert and the impact of the expert opinion on the outcome of criminal proceedings. (Too) often, judges face court appointed expert with questions beyond the legal framework; this indicates the judges' indecision when in distress and them turning to the court appointed expert, expecting them to answer the questions that should have been formulated by the judges themselves. The thesis thus draws attention to the importance of distinguishing between the function of court appointed expert and the function of judge, since in many cases judges rely wholly on the expert's opinion and, in the grounds, do not make their own evidentiary assessment but merely transcribe part of the expert opinion. The findings of the research part of this thesis, which address the impact of the expert opinion on the outcome of the criminal proceedings, are based on an insight into the selected court files at the Ljubljana District Court. The review of criminal cases has shown that the influence of the psychiatric and psychological court appointed expert on the outcome of the criminal proceedings is considerable, which raises the question of whether the defendant is truly afforded fair trial or not.

Keywords:expert opinion, outcome of criminal proceedings, impact on criminal proceedings, psychiatric court appointed expert, psychological court appointed expert, forensic psychology, forensic psychiatry

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back