izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava obnašanja regularnih in neregularnih konstrukcij pri potresni obremenitvi : raziskava, research
Kilar, Vojko (Author), Slak, Tomaž (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-EDPM24TC This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Vrsta predpisov, zahtev, smernic in priporočil v predpisih o gradnji stavb na potresnih območjih poudarja pomembnost tako v orisu kot v po višini čim bolj pravilnih (to ne pomeni nujno simetričnih) konstrukcij stavb. Kot negativne se obravnavajo vsake večje prekinitve vertikalnih nosilnih elementov kot tudi vsake večje spremembe togosti v posameznih etažah. Ob pregledu sodobnih konstrukcij stavb pa lahko ugotovimo, da se kreativnost sodobnega arhitekturnega izraza običajno izogiba uporabi preprostih regularnih oblik in se rada zateka k oblikam, ki so s konstrukcijskega stališča neregularne. Uporaba neregularnih konstrukcij v predpisih sicer ni izrecno prepovedana, pomembno pa se je zavedati, da so takšne konstrukcije načeloma dražje, manj varne in posledično nekonkurenčne.

Language:Slovenian
Work type:Not categorized (r6)
Tipology:1.03 - Short Scientific Article
Organization:FA - Faculty of Architecture
Year:2005
Publisher:Fakulteta za arhitekturo
Number of pages:str. 68-69
Numbering:[Št.] 1
UDC:624
ISSN on article:1580-5573
COBISS.SI-ID:1810820 Link is opened in a new window
Views:395
Downloads:110
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only to logged in users.
:
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Record is a part of a journal

Title:AR
Shortened title:AR, Arhit. razisk.
Publisher:Fakulteta za arhitekturo
ISSN:1580-5573
COBISS.SI-ID:111220736 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison of the behaviour of regular and irregular structures under earthquake loads
Abstract:
Various regulations, demands, guidelines and recommendations stipulated in building legislature for construction in earthquake prone areas state the importance of regular building structures, both in layout and heights (which doesn't mean they are necessarily symmetrical). All larger discontinuity of vertical load-bearing elements, just as any significant changes in rigidity of particular floors, is seen as negative. Upon a review of contemporary building structures we can nevertheless establish that creativity in contemporary architectural expression usually refrains from using simple regular forms and likes to take recluse in forms, which are, from the structural attitude, irregular. Use of irregular structures is not strictly prohibited in regulations, but we have to be aware that such structures are in principal more expensive, less safe and consequentially less competitive.


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back