izpis_h1_title_alt

Cilj posvečuje sredstva : argumentativne zmote v primeru Smolnikar
Bjelčevič, Aleksander (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://www.centerslo.net/files/file/simpozij/simp29/02_Bjelcevic.pdf This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Bredo Smolnikar je družina Nakrst leta 1999 tožila zaradi razžalitve v romanu Ko se tam gori olistajo breze. Do oprostilne sodbe leta 2007 je bila pisateljica deležna široke javne podpore oz. obrambe. V obrambo je bilo zapisanih več kot deset vrst argumentov, vendar od tega večina napačnih. V prispevku analiziram sledeče argumentacijske zmote: a) prehitra posplošitev, b) zmota zmote, c) enostranskost, č) ad hominem, d) sprenevedanje, e) do onemoglosti. Prvi dve zmoti sta logični, zadnje so zmote iz relevance, kar pomeni, da so ti argumenti za primer Smolnikar nerelevantni.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:slovenska književnost, slovenske pisateljice, Zlate depuške pripovedke, Najbolj zlata dépuška pripovedka o ihanski ruralki, Ko se tam gori olistjao breze, argumentacija, kazniva dejanja, fikcija
Work type:Not categorized (r6)
Tipology:1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Year:2010
Number of pages:Str. 19-25
UDC:821.163.6.09-3Smolnikar B.
COBISS.SI-ID:44026466 Link is opened in a new window
Views:665
Downloads:83
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only to logged in users.
:
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
In 1999, Breda Smolnikar was sued for defamation in her novel Ko se tam gori olistajo breze. She received broad public support until a verdict of not guilty was reached in 2007. In her public defence more than ten different arguments were in play, but most of them were fallacious. The most frequent logical fallacies were the following: a) hasty generalisation, b) argument from fallacy, c) one-sidedness, d) ad hominem, e) pretended ignorance, f) argument from repetition. The first and the second are formal fallacies, the rest are fallacies of relevance.


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back