20.500.12556/RUL-99054 Načela pripisovanja odgovornosti za kartelne kršitve v luči razvoja sodne prakse SEU Principles of attributing liability for cartel infringements in the light of the case law of the CJEU Primarni namen tega magistrskega dela je ob pregledu razvoja sodne prakse preučiti načela pripisovanja odgovornosti matičnim družbam za kartelne kršitve, storjene s strani njihovih hčerinskih družb. Kljub pomembni vlogi, ki jo gre pripisati načelom pripisovanja odgovornosti in posledicam, ki jih prinašajo za podjetja, njihov obseg in uporaba v praksi, zlasti zaradi nejasnih formulacij in nekonsistentne prakse tako Komisije kot tudi sodišč, vzbujata številne pomisleke. Trenutni način izvajanja politike ostrega obsojanja kartelnega dogovarjanja, katere glavni cilj je odvračati podjetja od kršitev konkurenčnega prava Unije, spričo naraščajočega števila zadev pred SEU ni učinkovito. Poleg tega podrobnejša analiza temeljnih stebrov doktrine ekonomske celote, ki predstavlja osrednji koncept pripisovanja odgovornosti, vodi do kontradiktornih in nelogičnih zaključkov, ki so hkrati v koliziji s temeljnimi človekovimi pravicami. Pričujoče magistrsko delo skuša na kritičen način predstaviti, kako Komisija in sodišča ustaljena načela pripisovanja odgovornosti aplicirajo in interpretirajo v praksi, pri čemer se osredotočajo zlasti na sodno prakso, ki je sledila prelomni sodbi v zadevi Akzo. Ta je potrdila domnevo izvajanja odločilnega vpliva v najstrožjem smislu in s tem razrešila številne polemike, a obenem sprožila prenekatera nova vprašanja. Glede na povedano je cilj te magistrske naloge poiskati odgovore nanje in na mestih, kjer je primerno, podati normativne predloge, ki ponujajo alternativni pristop obravnavanja koncepta pripisovanja odgovornosti, ki bi bil primernejši tako z vidika pravne varnosti kot tudi temeljnih pravic. The primary purpose of this thesis is to examine – predominantly through the body of Union case law – the legal principles underpinning the attribution of liability to a parent company for its subsidiary’s participation in a cartel infringement. Despite the significant impact the concept of parental liability has in practice and the remarkable consequences posed by it for corporate groups, there continues to be considerable uncertainty about its scope and application. Due to vague formulations of the principles, alongside obscure and inconsistent practices from both the Commission and the EU Courts, the universal acceptance of parental liability remains questionable. Moreover, doubts arise also as to the efficiency of the current anti-cartel enforcement policy in view of the fact that the number and gravity of cartel infringements seem not to have reduced despite the setting up of a strong deterrence mechanism. In addition, there is a ubiquitous risk that the principles used to impute liability are expanding themselves to the limit of their logic, which in turn leads to contradictory conclusions that are in conflict with fundamental human rights. In light of the above, this thesis aims to provide a critical narrative of the approaches undertaken by the Commission and the EU Courts when applying and interpreting the principles of parental liability, with a particular focus on case law following the issuing of the landmark Akzo judgement. The respective judgement brought about a long awaited clarity on the question of the presumption of decisive influence, while at the same time raising a plethora of new questions. This thesis clears up the remaining gaps and suggests, where appropriate, normative proposals that demonstrate how a substantive analysis of the concept of parental liability and its application can be improved in a way that ensures legal certainty and is in line with fundamental rights. odgovornost matičnih družb podjetje v smislu 101. člena PDEU domneva odločilnega vpliva načelo solidarne odgovornosti načelo osebne odgovornosti domneva nedolžnosti maksimizacija glob prenos podjetja parental liability the notion of an undertaking within the meaning of Article 101 TFEU presumption of decisive influence joint and several liability personal liability presumption of innocence maximisation of fines successive liability true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2017-12-23 07:15:07 2017-12-23 07:15:14 2022-08-16 10:31:14 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2017 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 78802 15958865 2772.pdf 2772.pdf 1 7ACDBF7004A93DC9DC1E7D52E37F7003 39d94655cff00e3f66cbacd43bc49b0c55ad79c17f6b4502026fd3ba93896f77 7c735d83-a1b4-11eb-a523-00155dcfd717 20.500.12556/rul/c1a5400b-c4c5-4d36-bdf6-47fa040fd46b https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=108403 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0