20.500.12556/RUL-98350
Večnaglasnice v slovenščini
magistrsko delo
Magistrsko delo skuša raziskati problem večnaglasnic v slovenščini z vidika splošnih fonoloških teorij. Zanimalo me je, ali obstaja razlika med tvorjenkami, za katere velja, da imajo več naglasov, in med tvorjenkami, za katere velja, da imajo en sam naglas. Raziskava je pokazala, da ni statistično značilnih razlik v trajanju in vrednostih formantnih frekvenc samoglasnikov, ki naj bi bili naglašeni, in samoglasnikov, ki naj ne bi bili. Lastnost, ki najjasneje ločuje naglašene samoglasnike od nenaglašenih, je daljše trajanje prvih. Pokazalo se je, da lahko glede na povprečne razlike v trajanju primerjanih samoglasnikov analizirane tvorjenke razvrstimo v tri različne skupine: tvorjenke s korenom v prvem delu, tvorjenke s predpono in tvorjenke s prevzeto sestavino. Analiza je potrdila, kar je pred tem ugotavljal že Jurgec (2007): število naglasov in prominentnost sta odvisna od fonološke in morfološke zgradbe besed. Zloženke oz. tvorjenke s korenom in tvorjenke s prevzeto sestavino v prvem delu so dvo- ali večnaglasne, medtem ko so tvorjenke s predpono bodisi dvonaglasne bodisi enonaglasne.
This MA thesis looks at secondary stress in Slovenian from the perspective of general phonological theory. The key question is whether there is a difference between derived words and compounds with and without secondary stress. The results indicate that there are no statistically significant differences in the duration and formant frequencies of vowels with and secondary stress and the ones without. The property that distinguishes the vowels that supposedely have (secondary) stress is duration. I found that the average differences in vowel length indicate three groups: compounds, prefixed words, and compounds with a foreign root. I analyze these differences by positing different prosodic strucures, following Jurgec (2007). Compounds have secondary stress at the level of phonological phrase, whereas prefixed words have either secondary stress at the level of prosodic word or no secondary stress. This MA thesis looks at secondary stress in Slovenian from the perspective of general phonological theory. The key question is whether there is a difference between derived words and compounds with and without secondary stress. The results indicate that there are no statistically significant differences in the duration and formant frequencies of vowels with and secondary stress and the ones without. The property that distinguishes the vowels that supposedely have (secondary) stress is duration. I found that the average differences in vowel length indicate three groups: compounds, prefixed words, and compounds with a foreign root. I analyze these differences by positing different prosodic strucures, following Jurgec (2007). Compounds have secondary stress at the level of phonological phrase, whereas prefixed words have either secondary stress at the level of prosodic word or no secondary stress.
slovenščina
fonologija
besedni naglas
fonološka beseda
večnaglasnice
tvorjenke
leksikografija
bolonjski magisteriji
true
false
false
[K. Jošt]
Slovenski jezik
Angleški jezik
Magistrsko delo/naloga
2017-11-28 12:56:41
2017-11-28 12:56:44
2022-08-12 14:46:24
0000-00-00 00:00:00
2016
0
Ljubljana
2016
Ljubljana
56 str., [9] f.
0000-00-00
NiDoloceno
NiDoloceno
NiDoloceno
0000-00-00
0000-00-00
0000-00-00
811.163.6'342.8'374
62114402
RAZ_Jost_Kaja_i2016.pdf
RAZ_Jost_Kaja_i2016.pdf
1
D57600BB2B7F0F9A33A743DCBEA06892
3835fca0b7b518342d15579e26afd52b6bc05d97accd34797904a3ad992c2245
5e3f2ef7-a1b4-11eb-a523-00155dcfd717
20.500.12556/rul/7a9ed343-e7cc-4f9b-96d4-a3a5734f2aa1
https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=107594
Filozofska fakulteta
0
0
0