20.500.12556/RUL-5446 Equity is efficient! Vrsta ekonomskih teorij govori o tem, da s povečanjem neenakosti med ljudmi vplivamo na povečano gospodarsko rast. Neenakost naj bi namreč prisilila ljudi k boljšemu in učinkovitejšemu delu. Drugi ekonomisti se s tem ne strinjajo in dokazujejo, da povečana neenakost zaviralno deluje na gospodarsko rast predvsem posredno z naraščajočimi socialnimi problemi. Sociologija pri tem nima trdnega stališča, čeprav poudarja negativne socialne sestavine neenakosti. V besedilu avtor na primeru tranzicijskih držav, pa tudi razvitih tržnih gospodarstev dokazuje, da prevelika neenakost v delitvi neposredno zmanjšuje gospodarsko rast, predvsem pa povečuje socialne probleme v družbi. There is a number of economic theories claiming that economic growth is accelerated by increasing inequality. Inequality is said to force people to work harder and more efficiently. On the other hand, other economists disagree with this theory claiming that increased inequality hinders economic growth, especially indirectly through greater social problems. Although the sociological science does not have a firm position concerning this matter it underlines the negative social components of inequality. The author of this paper tries to prove - using the example not only of transition but also of developed economies - that too wide inequality in distribution decreases economic growth, and at the same time increases social problems in a society. ekonomska rast družbena neenakost ekonomska učinkovitost ekonomski kazalci economic growth social inequality economic efficiency economic indicator true false false Slovenski jezik Neznan jezik Delo ni kategorizirano 2014-07-11 12:47:51 2014-07-11 12:47:51 2026-09-03 15:45:56 0000-00-00 00:00:00 1999 0 0 Str. 176-185 no. 30/31 Vol. 15 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 316.34 0352-3608 19471453 105186560 http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/dr/dr30-31hanzek.PDF 1 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=5446 Fakulteta za družbene vede Družboslovne razprave 0 0 0