20.500.12556/RUL-190828 Občestvo, sinodalnost in meja doktrinalnega kompromisa konstantinopelski koncil 879–880 kot teološki model edinosti Cerkve Communion, synodality, and the limits of doctrinal compromise the Council of Constantinople (879–880) as a theological model of Ecclesial Unity Članek obravnava konstantinopelski koncil 879–880 kot zgodovinsko določen dogodek obnovitve cerkvenega občestva po fotijevski krizi. Izhodišče ni splošna eklezi-ološka shema, temveč branje horosa, kanonov, papeških navodil legatom, pisem Janeza VIII. in poznejše recepcije koncila. Študija najprej postavi koncil v zaporedje sporov med Ignacijem in Fotijem, rimsko intervencijo, bolgarsko jurisdikcijsko vprašanje ter razmerje med konciloma 869–870 in 879–880. Nato filološko obravnava ključne izraze horosa: ὅρος(horos), σύνοδος (synodos), κοινωνία (koinonia), πίστις (pistis) in προσθήκη (prostheke). Posebno mesto ima analiza formule οὐδὲνἀφαιροῦντες, οὐδὲνπροστιθέντες, οὐδὲνἀμείβοντες, s katero koncil varuje nespremenjeno izročeno veroizpoved. Vprašanje Filioque je zato razloženo hkrati kot pnevmatološko vprašanje in kot vprašanje cerkvene avtoritete nad skupnim simbolom vere. Članek zagovarja tezo, da koncil 879–880 lahko služi kot teološki model edinosti Cerkve, samo če ga razumemo brez anahronizma: kot sinodalno in kanonično obnovitev občestva, ki dopušča disciplinski kompromis, ne dopušča pa spreminjanja skupne veroizpovedi The article examines the Council of Constantinople of 879–880 as a historically situated event of restoring ecclesial communion after the Photian crisis. Its point of departure is not a general ecclesiological scheme, but a close reading of the horos, the canons, the papal instructions to the legates, the letters of John VIII, and the later reception of the council. The study first places the council within the sequence of conflicts between Ignatius and Photius, Roman intervention, the Bulgarian jurisdictional question, and the relation between the councils of 869–870 and 879–880. It then offers a philological reading of the key terms of the horos: ὅρος (horos), σύνοδος (synodos), κοινωνία (koinonia), πίστις (pistis), and προσθήκη (prostheke). Particular attention is given to the formula οὐδὲνἀφαιροῦντες, οὐδὲνπροστιθέντες, οὐδὲν ἀμείβοντες, by which the council protects the unchanged inherited creed. The Filioqueis therefore interpreted both as a pneumatological issue and as a question of ecclesial au-thority over the common symbol of faith. The article argues that the council of 879–880 may serve as a theological model of ecclesial unity only if it is read without anachronism: as a synodal and canonical restoration of communion that allows disciplinary compromise but does not allow alteration of the common confession of faith. konstantinopelski koncil 879–880 Fotij Ignacij Janez VIII. občestvo sinodalnost Filioque horos Kanoni pentarhija Council of Constantinople 879–880 Photius Ignatius John VIII communion synodality Filioque horos canons pentarchy true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Članek v reviji 2026-11-05 09:06:49 2026-11-05 09:07:03 2026-11-06 04:29:31 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2026 0 0 Str. 71-84 št. 1 Letn. 81 2026 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2026-07-28 27-1-732.3"879/880" 2335-4127 10.34291/Edinost/81/01/Slomski 292916483 261025_teoful_ED2026-1_03-Słomski,Wojciech_web.pdf 261025_teoful_ED2026-1_03-Słomski,Wojciech_web.pdf 1 3EA20B09D4A770DCDE97ED2388C0A378 4d21ceaf48893858a56d3bab6779083cd09563837e20ccee2ef1d07c603848b4 01623e8e-d8f0-11f1-aea2-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=252512 https://journals.uni-lj.si/ED/article/view/28899/21657 1 d0a0c2ae-d8ef-11f1-aea2-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=252510 https://journals.uni-lj.si/ED/article/view/28899 1 d1441243-d8ef-11f1-aea2-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=252511 Teološka fakulteta Edinost in dialog 0 0 0