20.500.12556/RUL-190120 PROSTORSKE STRUKTURE IN KONFLIKTI BIVANJA Branje stanovanjskega tlorisa na območju Slovenije v drugi polovici 20. stoletja v odnosu do arhitekture, družbe in vsakdanjega življenja SPATIAL STRUCTURES AND CONFLICTS OF LIVING An analysis of residential floor plans in Slovenia in the second half of the 20th century in relation to architecture, society and everyday life Stanovanjski tloris je v magistrskem delu izhodišče za raziskovanje razmerja med širšimi pogoji njegovega nastanka in prostorskimi položaji, ki jih vzpostavlja za različne uporabnike. Tloris pri tem obravnavam kot prostorsko presečišče akterjev, ki nekatere dejavnosti, odnose in načine uporabe omogoča, druge otežuje, tretjih pa ne predvidi. Njihova razmerja se skozi čas spreminjajo, nobeno izmed njih pa prostorske organizacije ne določa neposredno ali samostojno. Tloris jih začasno stabilizira v sistemu prostorov, površin, opreme, pragov, povezav in predvidenih rab ter tako vzpostavlja različne prostorske pogoje za dejavnosti in uporabnike. Raziskava se osredotoča na stanovanjsko arhitekturo na območju Slovenije v drugi polovici 20. stoletja in poteka v več zaporednih korakih. Najprej rekonstruira spreminjajoče se pogoje nastajanja stanovanja skozi razvoj stanovanjskega sistema, arhitekturne stroke, izkušnje stanovalca oziroma oblik bivanja ter tehnologije in produkcije. Nato s pomočjo Stuarta Eldna in Beatriz Colomine oblikuje analitični aparat za relacijsko branje tlorisa. Na tej podlagi je analiziranih pet stanovanjskih primerov od poznih štiridesetih do osemdesetih let, ki so razumljeni kot primerjalni prostorski preseki in ne kot reprezentativni modeli posameznih desetletij. Prostorska analiza se nato bere skozi tri izpostavljena področja konfliktov bivanja. To je konflikt med spoloma, med generacijami ter med arhitektom in stanovalcem. V zadnjem delu naloge posamezne ugotovitve povežem v širši koncept tlorisa kot prostorskega presečišča in preverim njegovo vrednost kot zgodovinskega vira. Pri tem raziskava povezuje arhitekturne načrte z zakonodajo, strokovnimi besedili, podatki o stanovanjski politiki in produkciji ter viri o vsakdanjem življenju. Primerjava pokaže, da razvoja stanovanjskega tlorisa ni mogoče dovolj natančno opisati samo z večanjem števila prostorov ali njihovo vse večjo funkcionalno specializacijo. Pomembneje se spreminja, katera razmerja med dejavnostmi in uporabniki postanejo regulabilna ter iz čigavega prostorskega položaja jih je mogoče spreminjati. Dolgoročni premik je zato mogoče opisati kot prehod od diferenciacije prostorov k diferenciaciji prostorskih položajev. Ta razvoj ni linearen proces povečevanja prostorske svobode, saj izboljšanje določenih bivalnih pogojev, hkrati vzpostavijo nove omejitve oziroma nove oblike prostorske določenosti. Konflikti bivanja so zato razumljeni kot prostorski izrazi širših protislovij, skozi katere postanejo sočasne pridobitve in omejitve stanovanjske modernizacije posebej jasno berljive. Doprinos naloge je v relacijskem branju stanovanjskega tlorisa kot zgodovinskega vira, saj naloga raziskuje odnose, ki jih prostorska organizacija vzpostavlja.Tloris tako postane sredstvo za raziskovanje, kje in na kakšen način se širša zgodovinska razmerja skozi arhitekturni prevod konkretizirajo v prostoru ter kakšne možnosti in omejitve s tem vzpostavijo za vsakdanje bivanje. The housing floor plan serves as the point of departure for examining the relationship between the broader conditions of its production and the spatial positions it establishes for different users. In the thesis, I approach the floor plan as a spatial intersection of actors that enables certain activities, relations, and modes of use, makes others more difficult, and leaves still others unanticipated. The relationships between these actors change over time, yet none of them determines the spatial organisation directly or independently. The floor plan temporarily stabilises these relationships within a system of spaces, surfaces, furnishings, thresholds, connections, and anticipated uses, thereby establishing different spatial conditions for activities and users. The research focuses on housing architecture in Slovenia in the second half of the twentieth century and proceeds through several successive steps. It first reconstructs the changing conditions under which housing was produced by examining the development of the housing system, the architectural profession, the experience of inhabitants and forms of dwelling, as well as technology and production. Drawing on Stuart Elden and Beatriz Colomina, it then develops an analytical framework for a relational reading of the floor plan. On this basis, five housing examples from the late 1940s through the 1980s are analysed as comparative spatial cross-sections rather than as representative models of individual decades. The spatial analysis is subsequently read through three selected fields of conflicts of dwelling: conflict between genders, between generations, and between architect and inhabitant. In the final part of the thesis, the individual findings are brought together within the broader concept of the floor plan as a spatial intersection, and its value as a historical source is examined. The research combines architectural plans with legislation, professional and theoretical texts, data on housing policy and production, and sources on everyday life. The comparison shows that the development of the housing floor plan cannot be adequately described solely through an increase in the number of rooms or their growing functional specialisation. More significant is the changing question of which relations between activities and users become regulable, and from whose spatial position they can be altered. The long-term shift can therefore be described as a transition from the differentiation of spaces to the differentiation of spatial positions. This development does not represent a linear increase in spatial freedom, since improvements in particular housing conditions can simultaneously introduce new constraints or new forms of spatial determination. Conflicts of dwelling are therefore understood as spatial expressions of broader contradictions, through which the simultaneous gains and limitations of housing modernisation become particularly legible. The contribution of the thesis lies in a relational reading of the housing floor plan as a historical source, as it examines the relations established by spatial organisation. The floor plan thus becomes a means of investigating where and how broader historical relations acquire concrete spatial form through architectural translation, and what possibilities and constraints they establish for everyday dwelling. stanovanjski tloris prostorski položaj relacijsko branje regulabilnost arhitekturni prevod konflikti bivanja prostorsko presečišče prostorska zgodovina housing floor plan spatial position relational reading regulability architectural translation conflicts of dwelling spatial intersection spatial history true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2026-10-23 08:00:44 2026-10-23 08:01:00 2026-11-05 11:00:03 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2026 0 Ljubljana 0 202 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 135429 304045315 31148.pdf 31148.pdf 1 0356E5F5C9AF9D41B58739A490632FE5 8b7128ec0dc1808b51035abe0857ebb67b7d2a4058f09aeb56441a448dd60e9e 21354f9a-cea7-11f1-aea2-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=251192 31154.jpg 31154.jpg 1 B85983549661CB0B202A7CDA4B6B47BC 96c9828079cd8da878b3b1263d50ff4db0005492feb9de33110aa1fc683cfae5 2146239a-cea7-11f1-aea2-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=251193 Fakulteta za arhitekturo 0 0 0