20.500.12556/RUL-189122 Pantomima kot govorica materializma v Diderotovem Rameaujevem nečaku Pantomime as the language of materialism in Diderot’s Rameau’s Nephew V diplomskem delu obravnavam satiro Rameaujev nečak (Le Neveu de Rameau, 1821) francoskega razsvetljenskega filozofa in literata Denisa Diderota. V prvem delu diplomskega dela sem zajela informacije o Diderotovem materialističnem nauku ter interpretaciji narave. Avtor trdi, da je filozofija mogoča le, če so naravni pojavi povezani oz. uveriženi. Zanimalo me je, kakšna umetnost bi nastala kot odraz neločljivih, povezanih pojavov. Odgovor sem iskala v Diderotovem programskem tekstu Paradoks o igralcu. Metoda, ki jo avtor svetuje gledališčnikom temelji na posnemanju: igralci naj bi nosili masko čustvenosti, za njo pa skrivali svoj hladen obraz. Posnemanje je mogoče le, če med organizmi obstajajo jasne meje, čemur pa materializem z naukom o fluidnosti nasprotuje. Zanimalo me je, ali igralska metoda, ki jo Diderot svetuje, spodkopava materialistični monizem, saj posnemanje temelji na distinkciji med igralcem in njegovo vlogo. Izkazalo se je, da Diderot ločuje med uličnim in odrskim igralcem: slednjemu ne gre za realistično upodobitev, ampak za idealizirano vedenje ter ustvarjanje karakterno določljivih likov. Prepoznavnih, tipiziranih značajev, kakršne upodablja gledališče, ni najti v naravi, ki se po Diderotu nenehno spreminja. Zahteva pa jo razredna družba, da deluje usklajeno. Posledično je tudi poklicna igra Rameaujevega nečaka odrska: podreja se karikiranim predstavam o tipiziranih figurah pripadnikov najnižjega stanu. Toda fluidnosti in vitalizma narave ni mogoče zatreti –spregovori v nečakovih ekstatičnih nastopih pantomime, pri katerih izgubi razsodnost, njegovo telo pa naseljuje najrazličnejše vloge. In this thesis, I examine the satire Rameau’s Nephew (Le Neveu de Rameau, 1821) by the French Enlightenment philosopher and writer Denis Diderot. In the first part of the thesis, I have gathered information on Diderot’s materialist doctrine and his interpretation of nature. The author argues that philosophy is only possible if natural phenomena are interconnected or chained together. I was interested in what kind of art would emerge as a reflection of inseparable, interconnected phenomena. I sought the answer in Diderot’s programmatic text The Paradox of the Actor. The method that the author recommends to theatre practitioners is based on mimicry: actors are supposed to wear a mask of emotion, behind which they conceal their impassive face. Mimicry is only possible if there are clear boundaries between organisms, a notion which materialism, with its doctrine of fluidity, opposes. I was interested in whether the acting method recommended by Diderot undermines materialist monism, since imitation is based on the distinction between the actor and their role. It turned out that Diderot distinguishes between the street actor and the stage actor: the latter is not concerned with realistic portrayal, but with idealised behaviour and the creation of characters with definable traits. The recognisable, typified characters portrayed by the theatre are not to be found in nature, which, according to Diderot, is in a state of constant flux. Yet class-based society demands them in order to function harmoniously. Consequently, Rameau’s nephew’s professional acting is also theatrical: it conforms to caricatured notions of stereotyped figures belonging to the lowest social class. Yet the fluidity and vitality of nature cannot be suppressed – they find expression in the nephew’s ecstatic pantomime performances, during which he loses his sense of reason and his body takes on a wide variety of roles. literatura in filozofija razsvetljenstvo Denis Diderot: Rameaujev nečak Paradoks o igralcu materializem posnemanje pantomima literature and philosophy the Enlightenment Denis Diderot: Rameau’s Nephew The paradox of the actor materialism imitation pantomime true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2026-10-02 07:17:04 2026-10-02 07:17:11 2026-10-05 03:33:45 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2026 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 635839 74729.pdf 74729.pdf 1 CAD7E6183A3F23BA4C4570FFAF82653F 8219d5d2c82a29ed6429effd98fa406fcc7c181a5576b0b1dbb41c86ec86df01 6811c114-be20-11f1-8bc5-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=249585 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0