20.500.12556/RUL-189088 Ustavna skladnost novele ZZDej-N: Analiza omejitev svobodne gospodarske pobude koncesionarjev v zdravstvu Constitutional compliance of the ZZDej-N Amendment: Analysis of Restrictions on the Free Economic Iniciative of Concessionaires in Healthcare Zdravstveni sistem v Sloveniji predstavlja enega ključnih stebrov socialne države, kjer se prepletajo javni interesi z zasebno iniciativo. Z namenom jasne ločitve javne in zasebne zdravstvene dejavnosti je zakonodajalec leta 2025 sprejel novelo Zakona o zdravstveni dejavnosti (ZZDej-N), katera je uvedla omejitve, ki spreminjajo pogoje delovanja koncesionarjev v javni mreži. Jedro ustavnosodne presoje, ki je svoj epilog dobilo v delnih in končnih odločbah Ustavnega sodišča Republike Slovenije pod opravilno številko U-I-79/25, je vprašanje, kje je meja med legitimnim reguliranjem javne službe in nesorazmernim posegom v svobodno gospodarsko pobudo (74. člen Ustave Republike Slovenije). V magistrsko diplomskem delu analiziram nekatere uvedene omejitve, katerih skladnost je presojalo Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije v odločbah U-I-79/25, in sicer ustavno skladnost omejitev pri statusnem preoblikovanju in vezanosti na dejanskega lastnika, prepoved razpolaganja s presežkom prihodkov nad odhodki iz koncesijske dejavnosti ter omejitev pogodbenih oblik sodelovanja zdravstvenih delavcev. Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije je potrdilo zakonodajni koncept, po katerem koncesija ostaja strogo osebna pravica in neločljiv del regulirane javne zdravstvene službe. Celotna odločitev tako pomeni potrditev teže javnega interesa nad ekonomskimi svoboščinami koncesionarjev znotraj javne zdravstvene mreže. The healthcare system in Slovenia is one of the key pillars of the welfare state, where public interests intertwine with private initiative. With the aim of clearly separating public and private healthcare activities, the legislature adopted an amendment to the Healthcare Activities Act (ZZDej-N) in 2025, which introduced restrictions that alter the operating conditions for concessionaires within the public network. At the heart of the constitutional review, which culminated in the partial and final decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia under case number U-I-79/25, is the question of where the line lies between legitimate regulation of public services and disproportionate interference with free economic initiative (Article 74 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia). In this master’s thesis, I analyze certain restrictions whose constitutionality was assessed by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia in its decisions U-I-79/25, namely the constitutionality of restrictions on status transformation and ties to the actual owner, the prohibition on disposing of surplus revenue over expenses from concession activities, and restrictions on the contractual forms of cooperation among healthcare workers. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia upheld the legislative concept according to which a concession remains a strictly personal right and an inseparable part of the regulated public health service. The decision as a whole thus confirms the primacy of the public interest over the economic freedoms of concessionaires within the public health network. upravno pravo koncesija svobodna gospodarska pobuda javno zdravstvo novela ZZDej-N ustavna skladnost test sorazmernosti administrative law concession free economic initiative public healthcare ZZDej-N amendment constitutionality proportionality test true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2026-10-01 09:01:23 2026-10-01 09:01:24 2026-10-04 03:44:06 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2026 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 143960 30546.pdf 30546.pdf 1 5D333D7974270DC1E8EB4141B8807D24 3b996506b7316634e0d6c2515eac5f913dbe3e63f390299547c6b21fd12dbb2a ce7329fb-bd65-11f1-8bc5-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=249539 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0