20.500.12556/RUL-186260 Analiza učinkovitosti alternativnih modelov za učenje temeljnih postopkov oživljanja diplomsko delo Analysis of the effectiveness of alternative models in teaching basic life support diploma work Uvod: Temeljni postopki oživljanja (TPO) predstavljajo ključen ukrep ob nenadnem srčnem zastoju, pri katerem ima hitro in pravilno izvajanje stisov prsnega koša (SPK) pomembno vlogo. Za učinkovito učenje TPO se pogosto uporabljajo standardni modeli, vendar njihova uporaba zaradi finančnih in organizacijskih omejitev ni vedno mogoča v vseh okoljih. Zaradi tega se pojavljajo alternativni modeli, ki bi lahko omogočili širšo dostopnost izobraževanja na področju TPO. Namen: Namen diplomskega dela je bil ugotoviti primernost dveh alternativnih modelov za učenje SPK v primerjavi s standardnim modelom za učenje TPO. Raziskava se je osredotočila na primerjavo izvajanja SPK na alternativnih modelih, srček iz pene in ekomodel, predvsem glede določitve primernega mesta za izvajanje stisov in doseganja priporočene frekvence stisov. Metode dela: Raziskava je bila izvedena v simuliranem okolju. Vključenih je bilo 54 študentov zdravstvenih smeri, ki so izvajali SPK na treh različnih modelih: standardnem modelu, alternativnem modelu srček iz pene, položenem na silhueto trupa, in alternativnem ekomodelu. SPK so testiranci na vsakem modelu izvajali eno minuto. Za merjenje frekvence SPK je bila uporabljena plošča Kistler 9286 AA, poleg objektivnih meritev pa so udeleženci posamezne modele ocenili tudi s pomočjo evalvacijskega vprašalnika. Rezultati: Vsi udeleženci so pri vseh treh modelih pravilno določili mesto za izvajanje SPK. Pri frekvenci SPK so bile ugotovljene razlike med modeli. Povprečna frekvenca SPK je bila najvišja pri standardnem modelu (112 ± 13 stisov/minuto), sledila sta srček (107 ± 17 stisov/minuto) in ekomodel (106 ± 19 stisov/minuto), pri čemer so bile vse vrednosti znotraj priporočenega območja. Udeleženci so kot najbolj primeren model ocenili standardni model, sledil mu je srček, najmanj primeren pa je bil ekomodel. Pri alternativnih modelih so kljub določenim omejitvam prepoznali možnost uporabe pri učenju osnovnih elementov TPO. Razprava in zaključek: Rezultati kažejo, da sta alternativna modela primerna za učenje osnovnih elementov SPK, saj omogočata določitev učenja pravilnega mesta in izvajanje primerne frekvence stisov. Kljub temu standardni model ostaja najprimernejši pripomoček za usposabljanje TPO v zdravstvenem učnem okolju. Alternativna modela predstavljata možnost uporabe predvsem v okoljih, kjer standardni modeli niso dostopni, ter lahko pripomoreta k širjenju znanja TPO. Introduction: Basic Life Support (BLS) is a crucial intervention in cases of sudden cardiac arrest, where the rapid and correct performance of chest compressions (CC) plays a vital role. Standard manikins are commonly used for BLS training; however, due to financial and organizational constraints, their use is not always feasible in all settings. Consequently, alternative training models have emerged that could improve the accessibility of BLS education. Purpose: The aim of this thesis was to evaluate the suitability of two alternative models for teaching chest compressions compared with a standard BLS training manikin. The study focused on comparing the performance of chest compressions using the alternative foam heart model and the eco-model, particularly with regard to identifying the correct compression site and achieving the recommended compression rate. Methods: The study was conducted in a simulated environment and included 54 healthcare students. Participants performed chest compressions on three different training models: a standard BLS manikin, an alternative foam heart model placed on a torso silhouette, and an alternative eco-model. Chest compressions were performed on each model for one minute. Compression rate was measured using a Kistler 9286 AA force plate. In addition to the objective measurements, participants evaluated each model using an evaluation questionnaire. Results: All participants correctly identified the appropriate chest compression site on all three models. Differences in chest compression rate were observed between the models. The highest mean compression rate was recorded with the standard manikin (112 ± 13 compressions/min), followed by the foam heart model (107 ± 17 compressions/min) and the eco-model (106 ± 19 compressions/min). All mean values were within the recommended compression rate range. Participants rated the standard manikin as the most suitable training model, followed by the foam heart model, while the eco-model received the lowest suitability ratings. Despite certain limitations, participants recognized the potential of both alternative models for teaching the basic elements of BLS. Discussion and conclusion: The findings indicate that both alternative models are suitable for teaching the basic elements of chest compressions, as they enable learners to identify the correct compression site and achieve an appropriate compression rate. Nevertheless, the standard BLS manikin remains the preferred training tool in healthcare education because it provides a more realistic experience during skill acquisition. The alternative models may be particularly useful in settings where standard manikins are unavailable and could contribute to improving the accessibility and dissemination of BLS training. diplomska dela zdravstvena nega stisi prsnega koša usposabljanje laikov usposabljanje v izobraževalnih ustanovah primerjava modelov diploma theses nursing care chest compressions training of laypeople educational institution training model comparison true false false [P. Račič] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2026-08-29 07:46:47 2026-08-29 07:46:58 2026-08-31 07:58:44 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2026 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana VIII, 25 str., [1] str. pril. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 616-083 162750 289393923 63715.pdf 63715.pdf 1 D5771F409751F51474D3CB03B4772DA0 b6049d078d99797fed0d2edaf3f311a593010298101e99ecd74efd4e2879e72c a0317994-a36c-11f1-9b0d-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=245398 Zdravstvena fakulteta 0 0 0