20.500.12556/RUL-184971 Diaforična etika narave med mitično in logično zavestjo Diaphoric ethics of nature between mythic and logical consciousness Diplomsko delo analizira človekov aktualni in nekdanji odnos do narave s poudarkom na človeški zavesti, njenem delovanju in razvoju skozi zgodovino. Pri tem so ključnega pomena diaforična struktura naše zavesti ter dejanja, ki izhajajo iz nje: osnovno vzpostavljanje razlik, pa tudi kultura (in še podrobneje, religija) kot produkt tega razlikovanja. Glede na način in stopnjo razlikovanja lahko ločimo med mitično in logično zavestjo. Pri prvi je bil človek v pretežno poenotenem odnosu s svetom okoli sebe, medtem ko pri drugem že riše jasne ločnice med seboj in vsem ostalim, pa tudi prostor in čas sta zanj nepogrešljivi orodji za osmišljanje sveta. Na ta način je sprva formalna diafora postala absolutna. Ena temeljnih posledic vse večjega udejanjanja diafore je, da človek sebe vidi kot subjekt, naravo pa kot objekt. Tovrstna razlika mu odpre možnost bolj ali manj etičnega odnosa z naravo – možnost odgovornosti ali pa izkoriščanja. Slednje prevladuje v današnjem svetu ter s tem ogroža preživetje nas in drugih živih bitij; zato bi bilo smiselno, da bi z naravo spet začeli ravnati odgovorno in ji vrnili vsaj del njene izgubljene avtonomije. This undergraduate thesis analyzes man’s current and former relationship to nature with an emphasis on human consciousness, its functioning and development throughout history. The key elements here are the diaphoric structure of our consciousness and the actions that arise from it: the basic act of establishing distinctions, as well as culture (and more specifically, religion) as a product of this differentiation. Depending on the method and degree of differentiation, we can distinguish between mythic and logical consciousness. In the first, man was in a predominantly unified relationship with the world around him, while in the second he already draws clear divisions between himself and everything else, and space and time are also indispensable tools for his making sense of the world. In this way, the initially formal diaphora became absolute. One of the fundamental consequences of the increasing implementation of diaphora is that man sees himself as a subject and nature as an object. This kind of difference opens up for him the possibility of a more or less ethical relationship with nature – the possibility of responsibility or exploitation. The latter dominates today’s world and thus threatens the survival of us and other living beings; therefore, it would make sense to start treating nature responsibly again and to return to it at least a part of its lost autonomy. narava človek diafora odnos odgovornost nature man diaphora relationship responsibility true false false T. Kotnik Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2026-07-19 07:16:09 2026-07-19 07:16:18 2026-08-31 10:54:16 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2026 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 25 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 17:502(043.2) 618622 289436419 64998.pdf 64998.pdf 1 3EAA33BE5B17684D199BDF61E605810D e608a771d63fe87a3ae59d50e93eea40302246a8ddeedf58fb298b9ea03c3b2e bf966aa5-8330-11f1-9b0d-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=240432 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0