20.500.12556/RUL-183676 Razmnoževalna (reproduktivna) samoodločba moškega in ženske v kazenskem pravu magistrsko diplomsko delo Reproductive Self-Determination of Men and Women in Criminal Law Naloga obravnava razmnoževalno samoodločbo moškega in ženske kot novejšo pravno dobrino v kazenskem pravu. Posebna pozornost je namenjena razlikovanju med pozitivnim vidikom pravice, ki zajema svobodno odločitev za zaploditev potomca, ter negativnim vidikom, ki pomeni pravico posameznika, da ne zaplodi oziroma dopusti zaploditve potomca proti svoji volji oziroma mimo nje. Veljavni Kazenski zakonik razmnoževalne samoodločbe ne varuje sistematično kot samostojne pravne dobrine, temveč le posredno in fragmentarno preko drugih zaščitenih interesov. Posebej so izpostavljene sodobne oblike posegov, kot so sabotiranje kontracepcije, zavajanje glede plodnosti, neupravičena uporaba spolnih celic, oploditev brez veljavne privolitve ter manipulacije v postopkih reproduktivne medicine. Takšna ravnanja pogosto ne ustrezajo zakonskim znakom obstoječih kaznivih dejanj, zaradi česar v večini ostajajo nekaznovana. Zato naloga predlaga samostojno inkriminacijo, ki varuje razmnoževalno samoodločbo neodvisno od tehnik njene zlorabe. The thesis addresses the reproductive self-determination of men and women as a relatively new legal interest in criminal law. Particular attention is devoted to distinguishing between the positive aspect of this right, which encompasses the free decision to conceive a child, and the negative aspect, which refers to an individual’s right not to conceive or allow the conception of a child against their will or regardless of it. The current Criminal Code does not systematically protect reproductive self-determination as an independent legal interest, but only indirectly and fragmentarily through other protected interests. Special emphasis is placed on contemporary forms of interference, such as contraceptive sabotage, deception regarding fertility, unauthorized use of reproductive cells, fertilization without valid consent, and manipulation in reproductive medicine procedures. Such conduct often does not meet the statutory elements of existing criminal offences, which is why, in most cases, it remains unpunished. Therefore the thesis suggests a separate criminalization that protects reproductive self-determination independently of the method of its' abuse. razmnoževalna samoodločba kazensko pravo pravna praznina medicinsko kazensko pravo človekove pravice reproductive self-determination reproductive autonomy criminal law legal interest legal gap sexual self-determination medical criminal law human rights true false false A. Ščuka Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2026-06-17 09:00:36 2026-06-17 09:00:39 2026-07-09 15:09:41 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2026 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (37 str.)) 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 343.6:57.017.5(043.2.034.2) 138354 284263427 27749.pdf 27749.pdf 1 EFDAB4646697672EE19BC7C2488034B6 3c32467d08786f2fd0102502436b618b027c9aead6936f7d1c10d4ca2997dc82 31c8c777-6a1a-11f1-9b0d-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=235800 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0