20.500.12556/RUL-181972 Upravna regulacija znanstvene negotovosti: primer titanovega dioksida magistrsko delo Administrative regulation of scientific uncertainty: the case of titanium dioxide Magistrsko delo obravnava upravno regulacijo znanstvene negotovosti na področju kemikalij v Evropski uniji (EU). Osrednji raziskovalni problem je razvrstitev titanovega dioksida (TiO₂) kot rakotvorne snovi, ki je bila s strani Sodišča EU razveljavljena zaradi očitnih metodoloških napak. Namen dela je analizirati doseg proste presoje dokazov specializiranih agencij pri presoji zapletenih znanstvenih vprašanj v razmerah, kjer dokazi niso konsistentni. Raziskava temelji na kvalitativni pravni analizi zakonodaje (zlasti uredb CLP in REACH) ter sodne prakse Sodišča EU. Uporabljena je metoda študije primera TiO₂ v primerjavi z zadevo kreozota glede vprašanja delne ničnosti aktov. Empirični del vključuje polstrukturirana intervjuja z uslužbenkama Urada RS za kemikalije (URSK), ki sta neposredno sodelovali v postopkih harmonizirane razvrstitve snovi na ravni EU. Ugotovitve kažejo, da prosta presoja dokazov agencij, kot je ECHA, pri tehnokratskem odločanju ni neomejena. Sodišče EU je v primeru TiO₂ ugotovilo očitno napako pri uporabi Morrowovega izračuna in parametrov gostote delcev. Materialnopravni standard intrinzičnih lastnosti snovi deluje kot ključna varovalka, ki preprečuje razvrstitev na podlagi učinkov, ki so zgolj posledica specifičnih eksperimentalnih pogojev, kot je pljučna preobremenitev. Delo ponuja konkretne smernice za uporabo pristopa teže dokazov (Weight of Evidence) v nacionalni upravni praksi URSK. Raziskava prispeva k razvoju stroke javne uprave z osvetlitvijo meja tehnokratske avtonomije in nujnosti transparentnega sporočanja negotovosti. Rezultati poglabljajo razumevanje sodnega nadzora nad znanstveno-tehničnimi vprašanji ter razmerja med previdnostnim načelom in pravno varnostjo. This master's thesis examines the administrative regulation of scientific uncertainty in the field of chemicals within the European Union (EU). The central research problem concerns the classification of titanium dioxide (TiO₂) as a carcinogenic substance, which was annulled by the Court of Justice of the EU due to manifest methodological errors. The purpose of the study is to analyze the scope of free appraisal of evidence of specialized agencies when assessing complex scientific issues in situations where evidence is inconsistent. The research is based on a qualitative legal analysis of legislation (specifically the CLP and REACH regulations) and the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU. A case study method is applied to TiO₂, compared with the creosote case regarding the issue of partial annulment of administrative acts. The empirical part includes semi-structured interviews with officials from the Chemicals Office of the Republic of Slovenia (URSK) who directly participated in harmonized classification procedures at the EU level. The findings indicate that the free appraisal of evidence of agencies such as ECHA is not unlimited in technocratic decision-making. In the TiO₂ case, the Court of Justice identified a manifest error in the application of the Morrow calculation and particle density parameters. The substantive legal standard of intrinsic properties serves as a key safeguard, preventing classification based on effects that are merely the result of specific experimental conditions, such as lung overload. The work offers concrete guidelines for the application of the Weight of Evidence (WoE) approach in the national administrative practice of URSK. The research contributes to the development of public administration by clarifying the limits of technocratic autonomy and the necessity of transparent uncertainty communication. The results deepen the understanding of judicial review over scientific-technical issues and the relationship between the precautionary principle and legal certainty. titanov dioksid znanstvena negotovost prosta presoja dokazov pristop teže dokazov previdnostno načelo očitna napaka titanium dioxide scientific uncertainty free appraisal of evidence weight of evidence approach precautionary principle manifest error of assessment true false false [A. Gruden] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2026-04-21 09:45:01 2026-04-21 09:45:10 2026-05-04 16:04:37 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2026 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana IX, 70 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 347.919:35:54(043.2) 19048 276969475 Gruden_Ana_-_UPRAVNA_REGULACIJA_ZNANSTVENE_NEGOTOVOSTI_PRIMER_TITANOVEGA_DIOKSIDA.pdf Gruden_Ana_-_UPRAVNA_REGULACIJA_ZNANSTVENE_NEGOTOVOSTI_PRIMER_TITANOVEGA_DIOKSIDA.pdf 1 170EB8D1E1483E86C6383A4C3A25C85E 7480e1fd681111f1e88905f1a97bafbf461855135ef135cb219f67a364d7703a c86bfce0-3d55-11f1-b0ab-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=232808 Fakulteta za upravo 0 0 0