20.500.12556/RUL-180127 Novejše dileme o dometu privilegija zoper samoobtožbo in prepovedi sojenja o isti stvari na primeru kršitev v zvezi z drogami Recent dilemmas concerning the scope of the privilege against self-incrimination and the prohibition of double jeopardy in drug-related offences Avtorja obravnavata dve procesni dilemi, ki se porajata v postopkih zaradi prepovedanih ravnanj (prekrškov in kaznivih dejanj) s področja prepovedanih drog. V prvem delu namenita pozornost dometu varstva privilegija zoper samoobtožbo pri izročanju predmetov na zahtevo državnih organov. V drugem pa analizirata problematiko podvajanja kaznovalnih postopkov (prekrškovnega in kazenskega) in s tem problem dometa prepovedi ponovnega sojenja o isti stvari. Pri tem se osredotočita na nedavne spremembe pristopov evropskih in domačih sodišč k presoji omenjenih vprašanj. Glede tega ugotavljata, da v pozitivnem pravu ne najdemo podrobnejših in določnih pravil, kako naj ravnajo organi, soočeni s konkretnim problemom. Z obema jamstvoma skladno ravnanje državnih organov je zato morala vsebinsko napolniti sodna praksa evropskih in domačih sodišč, katere odgovori pa v nekaterih vidikih ostajajo nedorečeni. The authors examine two procedural dilemmas that arise in proceedings concerning drug-related offences (misdemeanour offences and criminal offences). The first part discusses the scope of the privilege against self-incrimination in situations where individuals are compelled to surrender objects upon request by state authorities. The second part addresses the problem of parallel punitive proceedings (misdemeanour and criminal proceedings) and, in this context, the scope of the prohibition of double jeopardy. The analysis focuses on recent developments in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and domestic courts in relation to these questions. The authors demonstrate that the existing legislation does not provide detailed or precise guidance on how authorities should act when faced with such issues. Consequently, it has been left to the case law of European and domestic courts to give substance to these guarantees; however, in some respects, the answers remain ambiguous. privilegij zoper samoobtožbo prepoved ponovnega sojenja o isti stvari jamstva kazenskega postopka kršitve v zvezi z drogami privilege against self-incrimination prohibition of double jeopardy (ne bis in idem) procedural guarantees in criminal proceedings drug-related offences true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Članek v reviji 2026-03-03 12:36:52 2026-03-03 13:09:32 2026-03-06 11:50:04 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 0 Str. 95-122, 259-260 Letn. 85 2025 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2025-12-30 343.575:347.9 1854-3839 10.51940/2025.1.95-122 269759235 RAZ_Hafner_Miha_2025.pdf RAZ_Hafner_Miha_2025.pdf 1 6ED85960119DCDED2CC007136A6BE16F b9420965044a5531baa806d5df3cc198b50dedb26228e716044eb3f0f3624bf7 781193a7-16f5-11f1-a1ba-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=229246 https://journals.uni-lj.si/LLR/article/view/26207 0 6e1841ff-16f5-11f1-a1ba-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=229245 Pravna fakulteta Zbornik znanstvenih razprav 0 0 0