20.500.12556/RUL-178806 Zagovorništvo v duševnem zdravju: študija primera magistrsko delo Advocacy in mental health: A case study magistrsko delo V magistrski nalogi analiziram delovanje skupine pri zagovorništvu Joca Podlesnika, mojega prijatelja z dolgoletnimi izkušnjami z institucionalno psihiatrijo, ki mu je grozila deložacija iz bivalne enote. Osredotočen sem na odnos med članicami zagovorniške skupine, predvsem med Jocem in drugimi osebami. Zagovorniško akcijo sem razdelil na dva dela oziroma na zgodbo in predzgodbo oziroma na subtilnejši in konkretnejši del. Na podlagi Joceve zgodbe sem napisal roman Titov sin in še eno dokumentarno zgodbo. V prvem delu, ko še nismo vedeli, da se bo akcija nadaljevala v drugi del, sva z Jocem prek promoviranja literarnega dela in drugih dejavnosti v javnosti (v medijih in na javnih dogodkih) skušala osveščati o škodljivosti institucij in pomenu dezinstitucionalizacije. V tem delu sva bila del zagovorniške skupine le Joc in jaz, jasnega cilja pa nisva imela. Potem se je pojavil konkreten problem (grozila mu je deložacija iz bivalne enote), in takrat se je zagovorniška skupina razširila, cilj pa je postal jasen – preprečitev brezdomstva. Magistrsko nalogo sem začel s pregledom teorije, povezane s temami, ki so bistvene za Jocevo življenje in našo zagovorniško akcijo – duševno zdravje, totalne ustanove, dezinstitucionalizacija, stigmatizacija, stanovanjska problematika, zagovorništvo, ter aktivistično socialno delo. Odločil sem se za kvalitativno raziskovanje, vrsta raziskovanja je bila študija primera, oprl sem se na akcijsko oziroma aktivistično raziskovanje. V empiričnem delu sem prek rezultatov in razprave o njih skušal odgovoriti na raziskovalna vprašanja: Kakšne so povezave med zagovorniško akcijo, usmerjeno v direktni problem, in osveščanjem javnosti? Kako (neprofesionalno, laično) zagovorništvo na obeh ravneh vpliva tako na krepitev moči osebe z izkušnjo duševne stiske kot na izhode iz krize?; Kakšen pomen ima odnos med udeleženci zagovorniške akcije? Kako lahko ta odnos prispeva h krepitvi moči?; Kako lahko k zagovorništvu in krepitvi moči prispeva (angažirano) leposlovje?; Je naša zagovorniška akcija uspešna? Na vprašanja sem skušal odgovoriti s prepletom opisa zgodbe, ki se je stkala v prostoru med Jocem, mano in zagovorniško skupino ter teorijo povezano s to zgodbo. Na glavno vprašanje (ali je bila akcija uspešna) sem dobil pozitiven dogovor, saj je po Tanji Lamovec in Vitu Flakerju (1993) vsaka akcija uspešna, tudi cilj zagovorniške skupine je bil dosežen. In my master’s thesis (Advocacy in Mental Health: A Case Study), I analyse how a group operated in advocating for Joc Podlesnik, my friend with long-term experience of institutional psychiatry, who was threatened with eviction from a residential unit. I focus on the relationships between members of the advocacy group, especially between Joc and the other individuals involved. I divided the advocacy action into two parts - a story and a pre-story, that is, a more subtle and a more concrete part. Based on Joc’s story, I wrote a novel and an additional documentary story. In the first part, when we did not yet know the action would continue into a second phase, Joc and I tried to raise awareness of the harmfulness of institutions and the importance of deinstitutionalisation by promoting the literary work and engaging in other public activities (in the media and at public events). At this stage, the advocacy group consisted only of Joc and me, and we did not have a clear goal. Later, a concrete problem arose (he was threatened with eviction from the residential unit), and at that point the advocacy group expanded and the goal became clear - preventing homelessness. I began the master’s thesis with a review of theory related to the themes essential to Joc’s life and to our advocacy action - mental health, total institutions, deinstitutionalisation, stigmatisation, housing issues, advocacy, and activist social work. I chose a qualitative research approach, specifically a case study, grounded in action or activist research. In the empirical section, through the results and their discussion, I sought to answer the research questions: What are the connections between advocacy focused on a direct problem and public awareness-raising? How does (non-professional, lay) advocacy on both levels influence both the empowerment of a person with lived experience of mental distress and the outcomes of their crisis? What is the significance of the relationship between participants in the advocacy action? How can this relationship contribute to empowerment? How can (engaged) fiction contribute to advocacy and empowerment? Was our advocacy action successful? I aimed to answer these questions by interweaving the description of the story that unfolded between Joc, myself, and the advocacy group with the theory related to this story. I arrived at a positive answer to the main question (whether the action was successful?), since according to Vito Flaker and Tanja Lamovec (1993), every action is successful, and in this case the advocacy group also achieved its goal. zagovorništvo aktivistično raziskovanje zagovorništvo z leposlovjem duševno zdravje dezinstitucionalizacija totalne ustanove stigmatizacija advocacy activist research advocacy through fiction mental health deinstitutionalization total institutions stigmatization true false false [A. Rožman] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2026-01-30 09:00:09 2026-01-30 09:00:15 2026-03-03 10:42:08 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2026 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 100 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 364.622 55721 270236419 19644.pdf 19644.pdf 1 989A7D47AC73ABEB41DA4405DB9D63B0 5bc22a4ec46c8c98803e1bd6c13fe09ab6c77f6fb543279bdf592548827aa0fe b330912b-fdb1-11f0-a1ba-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=226790 Fakulteta za socialno delo 0 0 0