20.500.12556/RUL-176872 Poznavanje ugovora vesti ter stališča o njem med študenti enovitega magistrskega študijskega programa Farmacija Knowledge and attitudes towards conscientious objection among students of the Uniform master's study programme Pharmacy Ugovor vesti je pravica posameznika, da v zakonsko določenih primerih odkloni dejanje, ki je v nasprotju z njegovim moralnim, etičnim ali verskim prepričanjem. V lekarniški praksi se nanaša predvsem na situacije, ko farmacevt zavrne izdajo določenega zdravila ali izvedbo storitve, ker bi bilo to v nasprotju z njegovo vestjo. V Sloveniji je področje ugovora vesti dolgo časa ostalo pravno nedorečeno, kar je povzročalo neenotnost v praksi in negotovost med farmacevti. S spremembo Zakona o lekarniški dejavnosti konec leta 2024 je bila uvedena popolna prepoved uveljavljanja ugovora vesti za lekarniške farmacevte, kar je sprožilo razprave o posegu v svobodo vesti in strokovno avtonomijo farmacevtov. Namen raziskave je bil ugotoviti, v kolikšni meri so študenti farmacije seznanjeni s pravico do ugovora vesti, z njeno zakonsko ureditvijo in s pomenom v lekarniški praksi ter kakšna so njihova stališča do možnosti njene uveljavitve. Raziskava je bila izvedena s pomočjo spletnega anketnega vprašalnika, ki je zajel študente vseh letnikov Enovitega magistrskega študijskega programa Farmacija na Univerzi v Ljubljani, vključno s študenti, vpisanimi v dodatno leto. Podatki so bili analizirani z opisno in s sklepno statistiko, z uporabo hi-kvadrat testa ter logistične regresije. Rezultati so pokazali, da večina študentov pozna pojem ugovora vesti, vendar je njihovo poznavanje zakonske ureditve pomanjkljivo. Večina anketirancev se strinja, da bi moral biti ugovor vesti farmacevtom omogočen, vendar le ob pogoju, da je pacientu hkrati zagotovljen neoviran dostop do zdravil. Študenti višjih letnikov so izkazali boljše poznavanje zakonskih določil in bolj uravnotežena stališča do etičnih dilem v lekarniški praksi. Analiza je pokazala, da je verska pripadnost, kot sociodemografski dejavnik, pomemben napovedni dejavnik podpori pravice do ugovora vesti. Versko opredeljeni študenti so izrazili večjo podporo in željo po uveljavljanju te pravice. Ugotovitve kažejo, da je med študenti farmacije prisotno zanimanje za etična vprašanja, povezana z ugovorom vesti, vendar bi bilo razumevanje tega področja smiselno poglobiti. To bi prispevalo k boljši pripravljenosti bodočih farmacevtov na soočanje z etičnimi dilemami v praksi in razumevanju pomena odgovornega ravnanja med svobodo vesti ter dolžnostjo do pacienta. Conscientious objection is the right of an individual to refuse, in cases defined by law, to perform an act that is contrary to their moral, ethical, or religious beliefs. In pharmaceutical practice, it mainly refers to situations in which a pharmacist refuses to dispense a particular medicine or provide a service because doing so would violate their conscience. In Slovenia, the issue of conscientious objection remained legally undefined for a long time, resulting in inconsistent practices and uncertainty among pharmacists. However, with the amendment to the Pharmacy Practice Act at the end of the year 2024, a complete ban on invoking conscientious objection for pharmacists was introduced, sparking debates about interference with freedom of conscience and the professional autonomy of pharmacists. The purpose of the study was to determine the extent to which pharmacy students are familiar with the right to conscientious objection, its legal regulation, and its relevance in pharmaceutical practice, as well as their attitudes toward the possibility of exercising this right. The research was conducted using an online questionnaire that included students from all years of the Uniform Master’s Degree Programme in Pharmacy at the University of Ljubljana, including those enrolled in an additional year. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, applying the chi-square test and logistic regression. The results showed that most students are familiar with the concept of conscientious objection, although their knowledge of its legal framework is insufficient. The majority of respondents agreed that pharmacists should be allowed to exercise conscientious objection, provided that the patient’s uninterrupted access to medicines is ensured. Senior-year students demonstrated a better understanding of legal provisions and more balanced views regarding ethical dilemmas in pharmaceutical practice. The analysis also revealed that religious affiliation, as a sociodemographic factor, is a significant predictor of support for the right to conscientious objection. Religiously affiliated students expressed greater support for and willingness to exercise this right. The findings indicate that pharmacy students show interest in ethical issues related to conscientious objection; however, a deeper understanding of this area would be beneficial. Strengthening their knowledge would contribute to better preparing future pharmacists for ethical dilemmas they may encounter in practice and for understanding the importance of responsible decision-making in balancing freedom of conscience with their duty to the patient. ugovor vesti študenti farmacije etična dilema zakonodaja pravice conscientious objection pharmacy students ethical dilemma legislation rights true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2025-12-12 08:45:07 2025-12-12 08:45:20 2025-12-25 03:35:27 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 122240 261343747 31738.pdf 31738.pdf 1 F20E4DA6FE505B5F694A23613F5E8F01 bb0260c0561da1287292563cf94081c9f1395a9d271f5a35750e000560779876 17636c04-d72e-11f0-9328-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=223501 Fakulteta za farmacijo 0 0 0