20.500.12556/RUL-176123 Mediacija - fenomen v teoriji, paradoks v praksi magistrsko diplomsko delo Mediation - a Phenomenon in Theory, a Paradox in Practice Magistrska naloga z naslovom "Mediacija – fenomen v teoriji, paradoks v praksi" obravnava razkorak med teoretično ureditvijo instituta mediacije in njeno dejansko uporabo v slovenskem pravnem sistemu. Mediacija je v zakonodaji predstavljena kot učinkovit, human in hiter način reševanja sporov, vendar njena uporaba v praksi ostaja nizka. Analiza vključuje pregled slovenskega zakonodajnega okvira, pregled sodne statistike ter izsledke dveh anket (med splošno populacijo in slovenskimi odvetniki), ki osvetljujejo stopnjo poznavanja in dejansko uporabo mediacije. Posebna pozornost je namenjena vlogi sodnikov pri napotitvah na mediacijo. Naloga vključuje tudi primerjalno analizo šestih tujih pravnih sistemov (Indija, Kitajska, Rusija, Kanada, Zambija, Evropska unija), ki pokažejo, da je uspešnost mediacije pogojena z zakonodajno podporo, kulturno sprejetostjo in institucionalno infrastrukturo. V zadnjem delu obravnavam še stroške mediacije, vlogo nevladnih organizacij, prihodnost instituta v luči umetne inteligence in ponudim predloge za izboljšanje. Ključna ugotovitev naloge je, da kljub dobrim zakonskim rešitvam mediacija v Sloveniji ostaja premalo uporabljena predvsem zaradi pomanjkanja sistemske podpore, sodniške prakse in ozaveščenosti. The master's thesis titled "Mediation – a Phenomenon in Theory, a Paradox in Practice" explores the discrepancy between the legal framework governing mediation and its actual implementation within the Slovenian legal system. Although mediation is promoted as an efficient, humane and cost-effective method of dispute resolution, its practical application remains limited. The thesis analyses the relevant Slovenian legislation, court statistics, and the results of two surveys (one among the general population and the other among Slovenian attorneys) to assess the public's awareness and practical use of mediation. Special attention is given to the role of judges in referring parties to mediation. A comparative analysis of six foreign legal systems (India, China, Russia, Canada, Zambia, European Union) reveals that the success of mediation depends on legislative support, cultural acceptance and institutional infrastructure. The final chapters address the cost of mediation, the role of non-governmental organisations, the potential of artificial intelligence in mediation, and provide proposals for systemic improvement. The key finding is that despite an adequate legal framework, mediation in Slovenia remains underused due to insufficient judicial initiative, lack of awareness and weak institutional incentives. mediacija alternativno reševanje sporov prostovoljnost sodna praksa pravna kultura umetna inteligenca primerjalno pravo mediation alternative dispute resolution voluntariness judicial practice legal culture artificial intelligence comparative law true false false A. Pristov Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2025-11-22 09:00:08 2025-11-22 09:00:16 2025-12-18 11:06:22 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 55 f. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 347.965.42(043) 133048 262072835 24717.pdf 24717.pdf 1 7569913F7034C72FCEA2263359A9AC5E 984ebf42352ad603f6db37a8582346f1b646b988b55baa871a3bac9a7f5b0771 f23663c7-c778-11f0-9328-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=222360 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0