20.500.12556/RUL-174785 Lacan in Merleau-Ponty: pogled in telo pogled in telo Lacan and Merleau-Ponty: vision and the body diplomska dela Jacques Lacan in Maurice Merleau-Ponty sta na podlagi knjige Henrija Wallona Les Origines du Caractère chez l'Enfant v svojih zgodnjih spisih razvila vplivne opise zrcalnega stadija, nato pa so se njune teorije – z različnimi poudarki – dalje razvijale tudi v naslednjih desetletjih. Med petdesetimi in šestdesetimi leti prejšnjega stoletja je Lacan prešel od poudarjanja simbolnega reda s pojmom ideala jaza Sigmunda Freuda k poznejšemu osredotočanju na realno, ki ga je najbolj izrazito artikuliral s pojmom objet a. Merleau-Ponty pa je svojo zgodnjo prevzeto teorijo operativne intencionalnosti Edmunda Husserla in svojo gestikularno teorijo pomena razširil najprej z vključitvijo diakritične teorije jezika Ferdinanda de Saussura in teorije praxis Karla Marxa, pozneje pa s preoblikovanjem svoje filozofije na podlagi opisa hiazmatičnega prepletanja Paula Valéryja, s katerima je poskušal preseči dihotomijo subjekt-objekt. Kljub občasnim trenutkom prekrivanja in nekaterim skupnim interesom, sta se na koncu njuna intelektualna projekta razšla, vendar pri tem ustvarila dva unikatna okvira za preučevanje zapletenega odnosa med pogledom in telesom. Jacques Lacan and Maurice Merleau-Ponty developed influential descriptions of the mirror stage in their early writings, based on Henri Wallon's book Les Origines du Caractère chez l'Enfant and then their theories were further developed – with different emphases – in the following decades. Between the 1950s and 1960s Lacan moved from an emphasis on the symbolic order with Sigmund Freud’s notion of the ego-ideal to a later focus on the real, which he articulated most explicitly with the notion of the objet a. Merleau-Ponty, on the other hand, extended his early adopted Edmund Husserl’s theory of operative intentionality and his gestural theory of meaning, first by incorporating Ferdinand de Saussure's diacritical theory of language and Karl Marx's theory of praxis and later by reformulating his philosophy on the basis of Paul Valéry's description of the chiasmatic entanglement in an attempt to transcend the subject- object dichotomy. Despite occasional moments of overlap and some common interests, their intellectual projects eventually diverged, but in doing so they created two unique frameworks for the study of the complex relationship between the gaze and the body. méconnaisance praxis ego objet a meso. méconnaisance praxis ego objet a flesh. true false false Ž. Sever Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2025-10-10 07:17:16 2025-10-10 07:17:21 2025-11-28 04:04:37 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 54 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 165.62:611/612(043.2) 599510 255402243 58058.pdf 58058.pdf 1 D3FD92E1B8BF376C76ED35DA296A9925 1c81d5b795a83f256418044e224010726c93c236adb332ddf5a91e787c72555a 28544791-a598-11f0-9328-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=219673 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0